Cardinal Raymond Burke had said that the SSPX is in schism. He is referring to the SSPX not accepting Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and rejecting Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) 1
He will not have expressed it with these terms but this is the message of his address at the Voice of the Family Conference on May 18, 2018.He said that other religions are false religions(this is Feeneyism), the one true Church of Christ subsists in only the Catholic Church(this is Feeneyism) and he proclaimed the Social Reign of Christ the King(based upon Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus) and asked others, Catholics, and non Catholics also, to do the same.
So he was affirming Tradition(Feeneyite EENS, Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology), like the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) but was not affirming Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) which would have been a rupture with Tradition(Feeneyite EENS etc). He could only endorse Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).There was no other option.There was no other way he could have been at home with Tradition( past ecclesiology) and also Vatican Council II. LG 8, LG 16 had to refer to unknown people ( Feeneyism), for him, otherwise there would be a rupture with EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church.
For Pope Benedict the SSPX would have to affirm Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and so like him and Cardinal Ladaria, be in schism with the past popes.This would be a heretical interpretation of Vatican Council II.In the past this was the only interpretation of Vatican Council II also known to Cardinal Raymond Burke.So from this Cushingite perspective the SSPX would be in schism, for him, for not affirming Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise, to create a rupture with Tradition.
So for the schismatic present Magisterium too there was only one interpretation of Vatican Council II known to them. They would not comment on Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) inspite of so many reports on line explaining it over the last six or more years.They are still maintaining their politically correct silence.
So for Michael Voris the SSPX is in schism since like him they have not accepted Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) which is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) and the Catechisms, interpreted with Cushingism.Church Militant TV continues to say outside the Church there is no salvation but refuses to say that the BOD, BOB and I.I are not explicit exceptions to traditional EENS. They are in line with the Cushingite Archbishop of Detroit and the Left there.
So the SSPX must continue to reject Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) as Cardinal Raymond Burke has now done .
The SSPX is correct. Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is a schism with the popes of the past.With the false premise it becomes a rupture with Tradition( Syllabus, old ecclesiology).But for some reason the SSPX is not affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) or even discussing it. None of their priests comment upon it. There is no Press Release explaining their position with reference to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
Why? Is it because Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of the traditional Feeneyism?
Is it because Archbishop Lefebvre wrongly interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism and did not seem to know about Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) ?
Was it because Cardinal Raymond Burke and all the other cardinals and bishops in the past only knew of Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and so for them the SSPX would be in schism for rejecting Vatican Council II (Cushingite) ?
We now know that the reading of Vatican Council II with only the Cushingite model is obsolete. It is obsolete for the traditionalists and the liberals.
The average Catholic would be able to see that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to invisible people, unknown people and so they cannot be mistaken as known people saved outside the Church.They will know that they have a choice . They can interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to unknown people in 2018 and they have a different interpretation of Vatican Council II from that of Michael Voris or the cardinals and popes, who are presently in schism.
This is the next step that the SSPX must take. They must show the two popes that the both of them, like the popes since Paul VI, were in heresy and in schism, for not affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the popes since Pius XII were also in heresy and schism for not affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) and wrongly replacing it with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cushingite).-Lionel Andrades
1.
https://www.churchmilitant.com/resistance-webinar?utm_source=CM.com+Email+Subscribers&utm_campaign=b9cd8c343d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_05_28_11_38_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6225e731a9-b9cd8c343d-62449253
MAY 28, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke endorses Tradition and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).If the SSPX follow him, this is a simple way to canonical recognition http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/cardinal-ratymond-burke-is-endorsing.html
MAY 28, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke's statement at the Voice of the Family Conference is sound orthodoxy in harmony with Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/cardinal-raymond-burkes-statement-at.html
MAY 27, 2018
Cardinal Burke has set a new theological and doctrinal model for sedevacantists and traditionalists.They can affirm tradition and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). He indicates liberals can no more cite Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, by using a false premise
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/cardinal-burke-has-set-new-theological.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment