Two mistakes of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j which all Catholics have to follow

There were two mistakes Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j made at the Placuit Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018.He assumed Lumen Gentium 8, Vatican Council II referred to the ordinary means of salvation and that it was not a reference to a hypothetical case. So it became an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and so the Church no more, for him, claims a superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.This is what he told the Associated Press reporter in response to her question.

While Cardinal Raymond Burke  corrected this error on May 18, 2018 at the Voice of the Family Conference.For him Lumen Gentium 8 was a hypothetical case and not the ordinary means of salvation.

But according to Cardinal Ladaria and the present two popes all Catholics have to interpret Vatican Council II with the Ladaria Error and not like Cardinal Raymond Burke.

Pope Benedict repeated the error in March 2016 (Avvenire) when he said in public that extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.For him there was a development with Vatican Council II.The development emerges when the Council is interpreted assuming Lumen Gentium  8 (saved outside the Catholic Church where the true Church subsists it in / elements of sanctification and truth in other religions etc) refer to non hypothetical and personally known people in the present times and that this is the ordinary means of salvation and so the conclusion is that there is known salvation outside the Church.

This is heresy and a rupture with Tradition.It is approved by the political Left.Cardinal Ladaria has a choice. He can interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism instead of his irrational and non traditional Cushingism.
He can also permit the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and then give them canonical recognition. They would be interpreting Vatican Council II like Cardinal Raymond Burke.-Lionel Andrades