John Henry Weston is unaware of his Cushingite theology, and he writes about Amoris Laetitia. Pope Francis also uses Cushingism( the unknown is known) to interpret moral theology as Weston does, to interpret salvation theology( invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible).So the editor of LifeSitesNews is in heresy and he does not defend himself.On the contrary he accuses the popes of being in heresy.
It is the same with those who signed the Filial Correction.
LifeSitesNews criticizes Pope Francis who could well be choosing heresy, to protect the Vatican and his life, just as the editor of LifeSites chooses heresy to protect his earnings.
For Pope Francis there could be known people in manifest mortal sin who are not going to Hell and can be given the Eucharist. For Pope Francis and John Henry Weston there are known people saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance etc who are objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and these known people will be saved without faith and baptism for them.
Both use an irrational premise, Cushingism, in salvation theology.
There are practical exceptions to the norm in moral theology for the two popes and there are practical exceptions to the norm in salvation theology, for the popes and John Henry Weston.
So for the pope and the correspondents of LifeSitesNews, invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.Also for both of them unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
So when Diane Montagna last interviewed Roberto dei Mattei on the Lepanto Foundation conference on June 23, 2018 she did not ask him how could Vatican Council II be a rupture with EENS for him and how could BOD,BOB and I.I be a rupture with Feeneyite EENS? Where are the exceptions in 2018? She could not ask him this since Lifesites maintains the same Cushingite policy on EENS and Vatican Council II, as do the present two popes and the Masons and Mattei.
Is this not modernism at a conference in which the speakers will speak against modernism.
How could she ask Roberto dei Mattei this when John Henry Weston is also a modernist?
How could she ask Roberto dei Mattei this when John Henry Weston is also a modernist?
Similarly when they will soon interview Bishop Athanasius Schneider they will not ask him if Vatican Council II, according to his proposed Syllabus of Errors, would be able to say that all the non Catholics in Kazakhstan, are oriented to Hell.Of course they die without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, Vatican Council II) .So must Vatican Council II be interpreted with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to EENS ? Of course this is how they interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.
But with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) there will be no rupture with EENS.Will this be acceptable for Bishop Athanasius Schneider ?
LifeSites is not going to send him this question and if they do he probably will not answer.
But with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) there will be no rupture with EENS.Will this be acceptable for Bishop Athanasius Schneider ?
LifeSites is not going to send him this question and if they do he probably will not answer.
They will not ask Archbishop Augustine di Noia and the others at Ecclesia Dei why do they not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS? It is possible.Is there a prohibition on interpreting Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS ? So the false premise always has to be used?
Similarly Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s,j was not asked at the Placuit Deo Press Conference(March 1,2018) how could LG 8 be an exception to Feeneyite EENS.Why not? Siince LG 8 is an exception to Feeneyite EENS for John Henry Weston.He is in schism with the past popes and he has changed the interpretation of EENS.
Similarly LifeSites will not ask Cardinal Raymond Burke how could Pope Benedict in March 2016 say that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century? It was a normal and acceptable statement from Pope Benedict for the editor of LifeSitesNews,who is also poltiically correct with the Left as are the present two popes.-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 12, 2018
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment