When the Vocations Director at Southwark, England says candidates with a religious vocation would have to hold the teaching summarised by the Latin expression extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) 1 he is refering to EENS Cushingite and not EENS, Feeneyite.
Pope Benedict was honest in March 2016(Avvenire) when he said that EENS was no more for him, the same as it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.For him Vatican Council II (Cushingite) was a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).So for him now there is only an EENS and Vatican Council II(Cushingite).This is made possible by interpreting the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) with Cushingism instead of traditional and rational Feeneyism.
So all vocations to the religious life, all over the world and not only in Southwark,have to interpret BOD,BOB and I.I with Cushingism. In this way Vatican Council II and EENS emerge as a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).
In 2016 Pope Benedict had a choice. He could have announced that he affirms EENS ( Feeneyite) and it is not contradicted by Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) interpreted with Feeneyism.
He did not do this.
Now all religious communities have to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingim, including the Society of St. Pius X and the Franciscans of the Immaculate.It includes all the Franciscans, Dominicans etc.
This was organised, legal and official deception in the Church during the pontificate of Pope Benedict and also when he was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Vatican Council II and EENS Cushingite is a personal theological interpretatiom of Pope Benedict and it is not magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake.
Instead we have here doctrinal confusion. Candidates with a religious vocation have to announce that unknown people saved with BOD, BOB and I.I are known exceptions to traditional EENS.
They have to pretend that invisible cases of LG 8 are visible exceptions to the Catholic Church's past understanding on it having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.
These are lies and deception and it is surprising no one has clarified and cleared the confusion via the civil authorities.
This is how Dr.Joseph Shaw interprets Vatican Council II and EENS at the Latin Mass and Dr. Gavin D'Costa at the university of Bristol does the same at Mass in England.The same Cushingism theology is used by John Lamont in Canada and Dr. Thomas Pink and Dr. John Rao in England.
I met a young religious sister from Australia, a postulant, at the Mother Teresa's Home, Settimo Cielo, Rome and she instinctively knew that all this was wrong.But she had to keep quiet. Since the priests and religious sisters of the Missionaries of Charity used this false premise to interpret EENS as does the Vocation Director at Southwark, England. It is approved by the liberal English bishops and the Masons there.
Now with Cushingism Pope Benedict has approved the New Evangelisation with joint missionary projects with the Christian denominations in Rome.With Cushingism there is the New Ecumenism and the New Ecclesiology...