The Mass is valid but the priest is in known heresy and so the Mass is a sacrilege for him. : Pope Francis and Archbishop Guido Pozzo

Comment sent to the blog Vox Cantoris -awaiting approval.

Vox, 

To understand me you must understand that the baptism of desire(BOD) , baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to EENS for Archbishop Lefebvre and they still are for the SSPX bishops and priests.

This has to be clear. 

Since if BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS you are implying that they refer to known non-Catholics saved outside the Church.They would have to be known and seen. Invisible people cannot be exceptions to EENS for example in 2018.

Similarly possibilities of salvation outside the Church are only theoretical for us. No one could have seen a St. Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.Possibilities are not real people and we need real people for them to be exceptions.

Thirdly, the ordinary means of salvation is faith and baptism. It is not BOD, BOB and I.I.

So Archbiship Lefebvre and Pope Pius XII made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.

The same mistake was repeated by Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits at Vatican Council II. They should not have mentioned BOD, BOB and I.I. Also they should not have mentioned LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc along with orthodox passages on salvation.They put them both together.

LG 8 etc are hypothetical only.They cannot be relevant or exceptions to the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II which support traditional EENS.

Once this is clear in your mind you will realize that Pope Francis and Archbishop Guido Pozzo and numerous others, interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with the error. They assume hypothetical and unknown people are objective exceptions to EENS. They also wrongly assume that LG 8 etc are exceptions to traditional EENS and the past ecclesiology.

So their whole theology is de- railed because of the philosophical mistake( invisible people are visible).

They interpret the Creeds with this irrationality. They misinterpret the Catechisms as a rupture with Tradition. They interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors etc.

The Mass is valid but the priest is in known heresy and so the Mass is a sacrilege for him.

-Lionel Andrades

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=20981956&postID=3997823654706353777&isPopup=true