So I am not saying anything new and neither am I rejecting Vatican Council II. I am citing Magisterial documents and affirming the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church.

I have to keep repeating again and again that what I write here is the teachings of the Catholic Church according to Vatican Council II and not just a personal view.

It is a personal interpretation of Magisterial documents in harmony with Tradition, in harmony with the past Magisterium.It is not the interpretation of Vatican Council II according to the leftist media.It is also not the interpretation of Pope Benedict, Pope Francis, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and Ecclesia Dei.

My interpretation is based on the text of Vatican Council II and the Catechisms interpreted rationally.

Their interpretation of Vatican Council II etc is based on a false premise( physically invisible non Catholics are visible) and false inference( they are visible examples of salvation outside the Church).So I can cite Vatican Council II to support my traditional view.While they can only cite the Council with an irrationality e.g personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance (Lumen Gentium 16) are alleged objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Or, there are known Protestants saved outside the Catholic Church in 'imperfect communion' with the Church (Unitatis Redintigratio 3). They are non-anonymous Christians who are exceptions to an ecumenism of return.
They have to presume what is unknown as being known and what is invisible as being invisible to cite Vatican Council II.
So on March 1, 2018 Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj at the Placuet Deo Press Conference cited visible for him cases of non Catholics saved with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) as an exception to EENS.
In response to the question by the Associated Press journalist he could have said that the Catholic Church today still holds its traditional understanding of having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation and the hypothetical and theoretical reference in LG 8 is not an exception.
He did not say this since he wanted a hermeneutic of rupture and the only way he could cite LG 8 was with the false premise and inference.

So for me the Catholic Church in the past and today is Feeneyite.It supports the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, the past ecclesiology and only an ecumenism of return.

Mission is traditional since all need faith and baptism for salvation ( Ad Gentes 7) and we know most people on earth go to Hell, since they die without faith and baptism.

Since outside the Church there is no salvation, the priority is that everyone become Catholic to save their soul.So it is important to have the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation of a Catholic State.

So I am not saying anything new and neither am I rejecting Vatican Council II. I am citing Magisterial documents  and affirming the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church.

 

It is the present two popes and the CDF who have brought a theological innovation in the Church by using an irrational premise and inference. It is they who must announce that invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism  of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions to EENS as it was known in the 16th century.

I hold the same understanding of mission and salvation as St.Francis Xavier whose feast day it is today. I support my view with Vatican Council II. The Council (AG 7) says all need to be members of the Church with faith and baptism for salvation. This includes those who know about Jesus and the Church and those who do not.-Lionel Andrades 

JULY 5, 2018

Reiterate
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/reiterate.html