January 6, 2019
Our Lady said at Fatima that in the end times there will be an apostasy in the Church ?
At Fatima did Our Lady say that the end times will be marked by an apostasy in the Church ? We can see it among the traditionalists Steve Skojec, Peter Kwaniewski, Fr. Brian Harrison Jospeh Shaw and others who do not want to affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma exttra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They prefer to say that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to EENS.
They do not want to be considered Anti Semitic and so Joseph Shaw the Chairman of the Latin Mass Society,England tells the Catholic Herald, U.K reporter
that the past traditionalists may be Anti Semitic but the present-trads
are not.He means it sincerely. Apostasy, heresy and sacrilege are not an issue for him as long as his employer and the local bishops supports it.
So
he creates a rupture with the Magisterium in the 16th century on EENS
by suggesting that he accepts EENS but with BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions.So everyone does not need to enter the Catholic Church for him, for salvation.
For him the Nicene Creed he would now say "
I believe not in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins but
three or more known baptisms. They are desire, blood and invincible
ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church"
This
is the first class heresy today's traditionalists support.This is being
done so that they do not have to affirm EENS, the- 16th- century
version.This is apostasy in the Church . It is present even among
cardinals and bishops and popes.
So
Steve Skojec would be comfortable to interpret the Catechism of Pope
Pius X ( invincible ignorance) as contradicting the Syllabus of Errors
of Pope Pius X ( EENS, ecumenism of return etc).He had no comment either
way when I mentioned this in previous blog posts.
Peter
Kwasniewski , Thomistic theologian, would interpret St. Thomas Aquinas
contradicting himself. Since Aquinas affirmed the strict interpretation
of EEN but when he mentioned the man in the forest in invincible
ignorance to whom God would send a preacher, since he was to be saved, he has to pretend like the liberal theologians that this is a known person saved outside the Church. This is the irrationality Kwasniewski employs and does not deny it. Since if he denied it he would have to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So when I wrote a series of reports recently on the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in NH., USA, Phil Lawler and rest of the faculty just sat through it in silence. They knew what the implications would be.They do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So when I wrote a series of reports recently on the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in NH., USA, Phil Lawler and rest of the faculty just sat through it in silence. They knew what the implications would be.They do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Now Skojec and Kwaniewski, like Fr. Brian Harrison can pretend that there are known exceptions to EENS and so no one can accuse them of being Anti-Semitic.
To remain politically correct with the Left the trads are supporting modernism.Hilary White recently wrote for the Remnant on modernism.She did not mention this issue.Michael Matt and Ann Barnhardt like her, support modernism by rejecting the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.The New Profession of Faith is made with the new version of the Nicene Creed.It is supported by Canon Law.So to be a Catholic in good standing according to the 1983 Code of Canon Law, it is necessary to say that BOD,BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. In other words there are objective non Catholics seen and saved outside the Church.
Those who signed the Filial Correction and spoke at the Lepanto and Catholic Identity Conference do
not want to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I
just being hypothetical, theoretical and speculative cases.It would be
dangerous for their careers or media.
Even after being informed Ryan Grant and the Rorate Caeli correspondents will not affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.
Similarly Fr.John Zuhlsdorf in response to a false accusation by Michael Sean Winters wrote that Bishop Morlino ,the bishop of Madison and he, do not affirm EENS like Fr. Feeney.
We also know that Fr. Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.So when Pope Benedict had to say that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, Fr. Zuhsldorf posted a meme saying, 'DON'T TOUCH'.
We also know that Fr. Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.So when Pope Benedict had to say that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, Fr. Zuhsldorf posted a meme saying, 'DON'T TOUCH'.
For Fr.Leonard Feeney and me there are no practical examples of the BOD, BOB and I.I. Literally there are no baptism of desire cases. This is something obvious.
The
apologist at EWTN John Martignoni agrees. He said that there are no
cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they are not exceptions to
EENS.Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb agree
with him.
But the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Centers,
the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney do not proclaim this even
though it is something obvious. It is common knowledge that we cannot
see people saved in Heaven with the baptism of desire or with the
baptism of blood and without the baptism of water.
The SBC no more affirm Feeneyite EENS perhaps because of persecution from the Left.
In the past they would project BOD, BOB and I.I theologically as not being exceptions to EENS.But they would not say that literally there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.
The SBC no more affirm Feeneyite EENS perhaps because of persecution from the Left.
In the past they would project BOD, BOB and I.I theologically as not being exceptions to EENS.But they would not say that literally there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.
Similarly
the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are silent on Vatican
Council II. Literally there are no known cases saved outside the Church
mentioned in Vatican Council II.So LG 8, LG 15 are not exceptions to
Feeneyite EENS.But if they announce this would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS.They too seek the approval of the local bishop and not run foul of laws supported by Satan and Left.
A few years have passed and Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei will not affirm Feeneyite EENS since they too do not want to be charged under Anti-Semitic laws.
So they will allow Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic
Church to be interpreted falsely and they will keep quiet.
The apostasy among the liberals and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican has been there.
But the traditionalists are the people who expect Pope Francis to be faithful to Catholic doctrine. They expect the same from the interpreters of doctrine at Medugorje. They would expect sound doctrine from Kiko Arguello and the Neo Catehecumenal Way.
They criticize Mass in the vernacular and now they wink and want to believe that the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and it is no issue. The Nicene Creed can be reinterpreted and it is not modernisn. The Athanasius Creed can be rejected and it is not heresy.
With all these abberrations it would be normal for them to attend Mass in Latin and it would not be a sacrilege.
The apostasy among the liberals and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican has been there.
But the traditionalists are the people who expect Pope Francis to be faithful to Catholic doctrine. They expect the same from the interpreters of doctrine at Medugorje. They would expect sound doctrine from Kiko Arguello and the Neo Catehecumenal Way.
They criticize Mass in the vernacular and now they wink and want to believe that the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and it is no issue. The Nicene Creed can be reinterpreted and it is not modernisn. The Athanasius Creed can be rejected and it is not heresy.
With all these abberrations it would be normal for them to attend Mass in Latin and it would not be a sacrilege.
-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 5, 2019
Peter
Kwasniewski and Steve Skojec are comfortable with the error : in this
way they are not obligated to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla
salus
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/peter-kwasniewski-and-steve-skojec-are.html
JANUARY 5, 2019
Vatican Council II has a heretical theology but in a peculiar way it can be interpreted non heretically
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/vatican-council-ii-has-heretical.html
If the SSPX does not admit and correct its mistake then the German bishops will persist in their error
JANUARY 4, 2019
Peter Kwasniewski uses the irrational option to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/peter-kwasniewski-uses-irrational.html
JANUARY 4, 2019
The SSPX must first put its house in order and then conduct doctrinal talks
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-sspx-must-first-put-its-house-in.html
JANUARY 4, 2019
If the SSPX does not admit and correct its mistake then the German bishops will persist in their error
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/if-sspx-does-not-admit-and-correct-its.html
______________________________________
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/our-lady-said-at-fatima-that-in-end.html
No comments:
Post a Comment