April 28, 2017
Bishop Fellay does not realize that he is confused between Feeneyism and Cushingism
The
dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed
surreptitiously by confused ideas wrote Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior
General of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX).1 He does not realize that it is he,
who is confused between Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation
of the dogma. That same confusion he extends to Vatican Council II.He
then makes the same error in the interpretation of the Catechism of Pope
Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995).
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known
exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit
cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It
is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there
are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need
for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of
desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle
hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
So
when he interprets invincible ignorance in the Catechism of Pope Pius X
he assumes it refers to a visible case and so is an exception to
outside the Church no salvation ( Feeneyite).
When I interpret invincible ignorance for example, in the Catechism of Pope Pius X it refers to an invisible case.
For
Father Pier Paulo Petrucci, Superior, SSPX, Italy the baptism of desire
refers to a visible case. So Vatican Council II has a rupture with the
dogma outside the Church there is no salvation( Feeneyite).He is a
Cushingite like Bishop Bernard Fellay.
For me
Lionel, the baptism of desire and blood with or without the baptism of
water in the Catholic Church refers to a physically invisible case. So
it cannot be relevant or an exception to the dogma EENS, as it was known
to the 16th century missionaries.2
Bishop Bernard Fellay could also clarify that I Lionel Andrades interpret Vatican Council II without an irrational premise and so my conclusion is different from his and the SSPX bishops and priests.It is the same with the dogma EENS.
This is Vatican Council II Feeneyite for me with these diagrams.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
2.
January 12, 2016
If the SSPX bishops and Fr.Pierpaulo Petrucci would admit that the baptism of desire refers to invisible cases in 2016, the entire interpretation of Vatican Council changes : error in the article
Fr. Pier Paolo Petrucci, Superior General,SSPX ,Italy makes the familiar SSPX error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/fr-pier-paolo-petrucci-superior.html
JULY 20, 2015
No response from Fraternita Sacerdotale San Pio X (SSPX Italy) : doctrinal mess http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/no-response-from-fraternita-sacerdotale.html
________________________________________________________
October 18, 2012
October 19, 2012
RAMPANT HERESY IN THE SSPX
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/rampant-heresy-in-sspx.html
SSPX DISTRICT ITALY CONFERENCE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/sspc-district-italy-conference-
October 17, 2012
October 17, 2012
Will Bishop Bernard Fellay give up Church teachings to protect the SSPX?
Vatican Council II can be accepted by the SSPX in accord with the dogma extra eccleesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.This will be a Vatican Council without the visible dead theory. It will be the Jewish Left who will oppose this interpretation of Vatican Council. Vatican Council II would be anti Semitic.
At Akita, Our Lady told the seer that
there will come a time when bishops will be against bishops and
cardinals against cardinals. At Fatima she said the Faith will be lost
(except in Portugal). Rome will lose the Faith, she said, at La Salle.
___________________________________________________________________
April 2, 2017
November 4, 2016
Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and conclusion : there is an option, a rational conclusion of which he is unaware of. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/bishop-bernard-fellay-interprets.html
September 25, 2016
Bishop Fellay's understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical.
September 11, 2016
Cardinal Muller, Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Fellay's theology is based on invisible cases being visible, what is not seen as being seen
June 14, 2016
SSPX doctrinal position is politically correct and heretical : Bishop Fellay interprets EENS and Vatican Council II assuming hypothetical cases are objectively known in the present times.
June 11, 2016
Apologists Mons. Clifford Fenton, Fr.William Most and Fr. John Hardon considered implicit cases as being explicit: traditionalists agree any one who does this is wrong http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/apologists-mons-clifford-fenton.html
____________________________________________
CARDINAL GERHARD MULLER : MISTAKES HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES AS BEING EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES.
That
has been discussed, but here, too, there has been a development of all
that was said in the Church, beginning with St. Cyprian, one of the
Fathers of the Church, in the third century. Again, the perspective is
different between then and now. In the third century, some Christian
groups wanted to be outside the Church, and what St. Cyprian said is
that without the Church a Christian cannot be saved. The
Second Vatican Council also said this: Lumen Gentium 14 says:
“Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made
necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not
be saved.” He who is aware of the presence of Revelation
is obliged by his conscience to belong publicly — and not only in his
conscience, in his heart — to this Catholic Church by remaining in
communion with the Pope and those bishops in communion with him.
But we cannot say that those who are inculpably ignorant of this truth are necessarily condemned for that reason. We
must hope that those who do not belong to the Church through no fault
of their own, but who follow the dictates of their God-given conscience,
will be saved by Jesus Christ whom they do not yet know. Every person has the right to act according to his or her own conscience. - Cardinal Gerhard Muller (10/02/2012 ). Archbishop Gerhard Müller: 'The Church Is Not a Fortress', National Catholic Register http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-mueller-the-church-is-not-a-fortress/#ixzz3pwkg3Mur
ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DO NOIA : ASSUMES WHAT IS KNOWN ONLY TO GOD CAN BE KNOWN AND JUDGED BY US HUMAN BEINGS.
I don’t know if you can blame this on the Council so much as the emergence of a theological trend that emphasized the possibility of salvation of non-Christians. But the Church has always affirmed this, and it has never denied it. …The Council did say there are elements of grace in other religions, and I don’t think that should be retracted. I’ve seen them, I know them — I’ve met Lutherans and Anglicans who are saints.' - Archbishop Augustine di Noia ( 07/01/2012 ), Archbishop Di Noia, Ecclesia Dei and the Society of St. Pius X, National Catholic Register.
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-dinoia-ecclesia-dei-and-the-society-of-st.-pius-x/#ixzz3Q1Vx3byR
___________________________
BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY ASSUMES THEORETICAL POSSIBILITIES KNOWN ONLY TO GOD ARE EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES AND RELEVANT TO EENS
The
same declaration (LG, 8) also recognizes the presence of “salvific
elements” in non-Catholic Christian communities. The decree on ecumenism
goes even further, adding that “the Spirit of Christ does not refrain
from using these churches and communities as means of salvation, which
derive their efficacy from the fullness of grace and truth entrusted to
the Catholic Church.” (UR, 3)
Such statements are irreconcilable with the dogma “No salvation outside of the Church, which
was reaffirmed by a Letter of the Holy Office on August 8,
1949". -Bishop Bernard Fellay (April 13, 2014 ) Letter to Friends and
Benefactors no. 82
http://www.dici.org/en/documents/letter-to-friends-and-benefactors-no-82/
________________________________________________________
http://www.dici.org/en/documents/letter-to-friends-and-benefactors-no-82/
________________________________________________________
Here are the controversial passages again
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/here-are-controversial-passages-again.html
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Archbishop
Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links
CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN ROME AGREE WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY: THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF
How can zero cases of something be considered exceptions ?- John Martignoni http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/sspx-only-way-out-now.html#links
Implicit
intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in
Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John
Martigioni http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/implicit-intention-invincible-ignorance.html
OCTOBER 16, 2013
DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/dean-of-theology-at-st-anselm-says.html
________________________________________________
Bishop Bernard Fellay made a factual mistake in Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82 : we cannot see the dead http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/bishop-bernard-fellay-has-made-factual.html#links
____________________________________
April 26, 2017
Diocese of Madison needs to choose Feeneyism instead of Cushingism in the interpretation of magisterial documents http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/diocese-of-madison-needs-to-choose.html
____________________________________
http://sspx.org/en/publications/letters/april-2017-letter-friends-and-benefactors-87-29356
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/04/bishop-fellay-does-not-realize-that-he.html
No comments:
Post a Comment