Repost : Since for Ludwig Ott there are exceptions to EENS,the old Catechisms would also be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology.It would contradict an ecumenism of return and no salvation outside the Church

The same attitude is seen in humble compilers who write reliable summaries of the truths of Faith, constantly proclaimed and defended at the price of martyrs’ blood. In English one might think of the aptly named Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma by Fr. Ludwig Ott, or the Fundamentals of Catholicism by Fr. Kenneth Baker.

Poor Ludwig Ott, poor Kenneth Baker, whom the Henricis of the world have lumped in with those uneducated Protestants who believe in objective, unchanging truths of revelation!-Peter Kwasniewski, Why Catholicism is necessarily dogmatic, with a definite content       https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/why-catholicism-is-necessarily-dogmatic-with-a-definite-content

 JULY 2, 2018

Since for Ludwig Ott there are exceptions to EENS,the old Catechisms would also be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology.It would contradict an ecumenism of return and no salvation outside the Church

Since for Ludwig Ott the baptism of desire(BOD) , baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I)  are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS,the Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore and Pius X would also be a rupture with the past ecclesiology on ecumenism and outside the Church no salvation etc.Since when they refer to BOD, BOB and I.I, they would be interpreted as referring not to invisible cases but known people saved outside the Catholic Church.


CATECHISMS AND VATICAN COUNCIL II A RUPTURE WITH THE PAST FOR SCHNEIDER AND FASTIGGI

It is the same with Bishop Athansius Schneider and Dr.Robert Fastiggi.Not only would the Catechisms be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology because of the false premise but even Vatican Council II has to be a rupture with the past.This would be normal for Cushingites.

So they interpret LG 8 etc as being a visible example of salvation outside the Church.Vatican Council II is interpreted as a rupture with the past ecclesiology.So there are new doctrines in the Church on salvation.

BISHOP SCHNEIDER AND PROF. ROBERT FASTIGGI ARE CUSHINGITES AND LUDWIG OTT IS NOT A FEENEYITE
Last month it was announced that  Baronius Press released  a new edition of Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma. Although based on the original translation by Dr. Patrick Lynch it has been "fully revised and updated" by Dr. Robert Fastiggi. The Foreword was written by Bishop Athanasius Schneider.

BOD, BOB AND I.I WOULD ALSO CONTRADICT THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS FOR SANBORN AND PIVARUNAS

Similarly for the sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas, BOD,BOB and I.I are a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So BOD, BOB and I.I would also contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on ecumenism.The old ecumenism of return would have practical  exceptions.

The sedevacantist bishops may criticize Fr.Leonard Feeny on EENS and will not affirm 'the strict interpretation' of EENS, like the Jesuits in the Middle Ages, but they still use the same faulty reasoning to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.So the Council is a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite) for them.But without Cushingism as a philosophy and theology the Council supports Fr. Leonard Feeney.
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS FR. LEONARD FEENEY

Without the irrational premise, without Cushingite theology; the New Theology, Vatican Council II supports Fr. Leonard Feeney.

Also the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) interpreted with Feeneyism would be in harmony with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite), EENS( Feeneyite), the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite) etc.

TRADITIONAL MISSION
There would be mission/evangelisation, knowing that all non Catholics in 2018 are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism.There are no known exceptions.
It would also mean that all who have died as non Catholics are in Hell without faith and baptism and there are no known exceptions for us human beings. Faith and the baptism of water is the norm, the ordinary means of salvation.

CHURCH TELLS US THAT ALL NON CATHOLICS ARE IN HELL
So the Church tells us that all non Catholics are in Hell (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, the Council of Florence etc on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(845,846,1257 etc).

Bishop Schneider and Dr.Robert Fastiggi  are not willing to affirm this in public.They are comfortable with Vatican Council II (Cushingite)-Lionel Andrades

SATURDAY, JUNE 2, 2018

Baronius Press and Dr.Robert Fastiggi have brought out a new edition of Ludwig Otts Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma since it supports the present liberalism in the Catholic Church, with its Cushingite theology

Baronius Press and Dr.Robert Fastiggi have brought out a new edition of Ludwig OttsFundamentals of Catholic Dogma since it supports the present liberalism in the Catholic Church, with its Cushingite theology.

With Cushingism Dr. Fastiggi infers that Fr. Leonard Feeney and not the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was in heresy.

With Cushingism Dr. Fastiggi reasons that Archbishop Lefebvre was wrong not to affirm the official Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II, which was a rupture with Tradition.

As a professor of theology in Detroit he has been given a mandatam to teach theology by the Archbishop since Dr. Fastiggi will not interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Feeneyite philosophy and theology.For then Vatican Council II would be in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors.

With Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) Bishop Donald Sanborn whom Dr. Fastiggi debated on Ecclesiology, would not have to reject Vatican Council II as being in schism with the past popes on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past ecclesiology.There could only be an ecumenism of return based on the old ecclesiology and this would not be welcome for the liberals in Detroit or the USCCB.

If Dr. Fastiggi interprets Vatican Council II  with Feeneyism, he would not be in schism with the past popes, as he is presently in, with Cushingism theology,  but there would be a rupture with the Archdiocese of Detroit and the Rector of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary where he teaches. They interpret all Magisterial documents with Cushingism which creates the break with Tradition.

Since Ludwig Ott was not Feeneyite, he has contributed to the present doctrinal confusion in the Church and the Archdiocese of Detroit and the liberals promotes his book.-Lionel Andrades

JUNE 2, 2018

Ludwig Ott is in a rupture with the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century and Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/message-incomplete-come-back-after-30.html

JUNE 1, 2018

Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma is Cushingite, it overlooks an irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Prof Robert Fastiggi also use the false premise to interpret BOD, BOB and I.I and Magisterial documents to create a schism with the past popes

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/ludwig-otts-fundamentals-of-catholic.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/since-for-ludwig-ott-there-are.html