So Feenyism, which I have seen listed as a heresy, because it denied baptism by desire, is NOT a heresy? I first read about this, and bought it was great until the “h” word continued to pop up. Does this deny baptism by desire?
Lionel: It is helpful to make the distinction between Feeneyism and Cushingism( according to L.A). With Cushingism the dogma EENS has exceptions of the BOD, BOB and I.I. This was rejected by Fr. Leonard Feeneyism.With Feeneyism( according to L.A) the dogma EENS does not have exceptions to BOD, BOB and I.I.
Cushingism creates a heretical conclusion. Cushingism today is like the Arian heresy of the past. It has spread throughout the Catholic Church.
__________________________________
Lionel: All those who do not receive the baptism of water and who die without Catholic faith are damned, is the dogmatic teaching of EENS.We cannot know of any one justified. This would only be known to God. So we must not confuse what is hypothetical as being relevant to EENS.
___________________________________
corran483 That makes sense. I just read an article in the Remnant Newspaper, by John Salza, and he used Feenyism as the extreme side of the no salvation outside the church doctrine. He compared it as the opposite of universalism like Father Baron promotes. If Feeny does not deny baptism by desire, I don’t understand the problem.
Lionel: John Salza and the Society of St. Pius X priests and lay followers assume there are personally known cases of the BOD. So for them BOD, is an exception to EENS. Only since there are personally known people saved outside the Church can there be exceptions to EENS. This is Cushingite philosophy and theology. The conclusion is non traditional and heretical.
___________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment