Lionel: Fr.Cekada assumes invisible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to EENS. This is a false principle.
Similarly he assumes unknown cases of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc are known exceptions to EENS and so he rejects Vatican Council II. Again he is irrational. In principle there are no physically known cases of BOD BOB and I.I or LG 8 etc.
________________________________________
Don't the SSPX preach "authentic Catholicism" also, Mr Vorris?
Lionel: No. They are Cushingites. They assume unknown people in our reality are known examples of salvation outside the Church. With this false premise they have changed our understanding of EENS, Nicene Creed, Catechisms etc .Theologically they are on the same platform as the liberals and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican.
__________________________________
Michael won't dare debate the Brothers Dimond. They would likely wipe the floor with him and his heresies- including those on baptism of desire and invinceable ignorance.
Lionel: The Dimond Brothers also assume that there are known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they are rejected, while they affirm Feeneyite EENS. Similarly they wrongly assume there known cases of LG 8 etc in Vatican Council II which would contradict EENS. They are Cushingites on Vatican Council II.They are only aware of Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and do not seem know about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which would be in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite).
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment