Jim Russell like the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith use Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS and so they create a rupture with Tradition. This is a private and heretical theological opinion.

Comments from FR. FEENEY’S STRANGE DOCTRINE

• −

Jim Russell  harveydude • 18 hours ago

My take--as the author of the piece--is that the key doctrinal stance of followers of Feeney (at least from the SBC group interviewed by CM) is that they hold *only* a private theological opinion on this matter. By its nature, private theological opinions do *not* have to be held by all the faithful in communion with the Catholic Church. Thus my view is at odds with this theological opinion, and CM was kind enough to offer it to its readers, alongside the other coverage that is happening of this complicated case.

Lionel: The SBC believe that they hold
 the theological teaching of the Catholic
 Church over the centuries.It is also 
supported by Vatican Council II and the 
Catechisms, when interpreted with 
Feeneyism ( hypothetical cases of BOD,
 BOB and I.I are not objective) and when 
we avoid Cushingism( theoretical cases
 of BOD, BOB and I.I are objective 
examples of salvation in the present
 times).

So for Brother Andre Marie,he was 
expressing the teaching of the
 Catholic Church before and after
 Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.

Jim Russell like the ecclesiastics
 at the Congregation for the 
Doctrine of the Faith uses
Cushingism to  interpret Vatican 
Council II and EENS.So they 
create a rupture with 

Tradition. This is a private and 
heretical theological opinion.

-Lionel Andrades

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/fr.-feeneys-strange-doctrine