March 14, 2018
Without the irrational interpretation of BOD,BOB and I.I by the sedevacantists CMRI, Quanta Cura, Syllabus of Errors,Mystici Corporis etc are not contradicted by Vatican Council II : the fault lies with the sedevacantists and not Vatican Council II
from the sedevacantist CMRI webiste
Theological Position: Sede Vacante
The Roman Catholic priests of the Religious Congregation of Mary
Immaculate Queen profess and adhere to the Catholic Faith as it has been
consistently
taught throughout the centuries since the time of Christ.
Lionel
: This is not true. The CMRI interpret the baptism of desire(BOD),
baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to known people saved outside the Church.So it is a practical exception to EENS.
There are no such known cases in 2018.
So with hypothetical BOD,BOB and I.I there can be no exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). This is a mistake of the CMRI, the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II.
The CMRI can change to hypothetical instead of non hypothetical BOD, BOB and I.I.Then the conclusion of Vatican Council II is different.
The CMRI can change to hypothetical instead of non hypothetical BOD, BOB and I.I.Then the conclusion of Vatican Council II is different.
__________________
With the death of Pope Pius XII and with the convocation of the
Second Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the
Church, which threatens her very doctrines and worship. In order to
provide for the preservation of the Catholic Faith and the traditional
Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Sacraments, the following statement has
been drawn up for the purpose of clearly defining the actual position
that these priests have taken.
I. VATICAN COUNCIL II: Convoked by John XXIII for the purpose of
“updating” the Church, this council (held from 1962-65) decreed and
implemented teachings which had been previously condemned by the
Infallible Teaching Magisterium of the Church. The Second Vatican
Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious
liberty and false ecumenism. These were previously condemned by:
Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)
Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)
Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)
Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)
Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)
Lionel:
Without the irrational interpretation of BOD,BOB and I.I by the CMRI
community none of these documents would be contradicted by Vatican
Council II.
______________________
THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false
council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals.
Lionel: There can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II and the CMRI has chosen the irrational one.
_________________________
II. NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: Following the Second Vatican Council, various
commissions were established to modernize the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass
and the traditional rites of the Sacraments. The particular commission
established to modernize the Mass included well-known Protestant
theologians. To use the words of a well-known Cardinal, Alfredo
Ottaviani, in 1969: “(The Novus Ordo Missae) represents a striking
departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in
Session XXII of the Council of Trent.”
Lionel:
Cardinal Ottaviani had used the irrational interpretation of BOD, BOB
and I.I to reject Feeneyite EENS.So the ecclesiology of the Mass had
changed. This was not due to the liturgy but a change in theology which
changed doctrine and rejected the dogma EENS.At Mass there was no more
the old exclusivist understanding of salvation.
I
attend the Novus Ordo Mass.For me there is no change in the
ecclesiiology of the Church.It is disappointing for me when the priests
at the Novus Ordo and Traditional Latin Mass do not affirm Feeneyite
EENS.
Even the CMRI like the SSPX and FSSP do not not affirm Feeneyite EENS. So doctrine stands changed.
Even the CMRI like the SSPX and FSSP do not not affirm Feeneyite EENS. So doctrine stands changed.
____________________________
The results of this modernization were a new definition of the Mass
(reflecting Luther’s concept of the Last Supper), the alteration of the
Offertory prayers to delete the concept of propitiatory Sacrifice, and
the substantial alteration of the very words of Consecration (this
alteration occurs in the vernacular translations). This new mass, known
as the Novus Ordo Missae, contradicts previous infallible teachings and
decrees of the Catholic Church, such as:
Pope St. Pius V’s Quo Primum and De Defectibus,
the Council of Trent’s decree on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (Session XXII),
Pope Leo XIII’s Apostolicae Curae (1896),
Pope Pius XII’s Mediator Dei (1947),
Pope Pius XII’s Sacramentum Ordinis (1948).
Lionel: For me the Novus Ordo Mass does not contradict any of these documents.
_________________________________
THEREFORE, the Novus Ordo Missae, when offered with the altered words of
Consecration, is an invalid Mass and in all other cases it is of
doubtful validity. It always is a clear danger to one’s faith. For all
these reasons, active participation in it would be a grave sin.
III. NEW RITES OF THE SACRAMENTS: That which has been said of the Novus
Ordo Missae can, in the same respect, be said of the new Vatican II
rites for the seven sacraments. To the degree that the matter, form and
intention of each of the sacraments has been substantially altered, to
that degree their validity must be questioned. The Catholic Church has,
most certainly, always taught what the proper matter, form and intention
are in the confecting of the sacraments.
THEREFORE, where the new rites have been employed, traditional priests should administer the Sacraments sub conditione as the situation may demand.
IV. MODERN VATICAN II CHURCH: The Catholic Church is identified as the
true Church of Christ by her four marks (Unity, Holiness, Catholicity,
and Apostolicity).
Lionel:
The CMRI community with physically visible BOD, BOB and I.I, has
changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed, re-interpreted Vatican
Council II as a rupture with EENS, accepted EENS with visible instead of
invisible BOD,BOB and I.I etc.This is all heresy. It is an impediment
to offering Mass.These are mortal sins of faith.
________________________________
Since the heretical teachings of Vatican II, the Novus Ordo Missae, and
the new rites of the sacraments have manifestly been a departure from
the Catholic Church’s traditional teachings, it must be concluded that
this modern so-called “Catholic” Church no longer possesses the first
two marks of the true Church — namely, Unity and Holiness. Its obvious
departure over the past twenty-five years from what the Catholic Church
has always held can lead to only one conclusion: a new ecumenical Church
has been established which stands in contradiction to the true Catholic
Church.
Lionel.
The new ecumenism, like the new theology and new evangelisation, has
its foundation on there being known salvation outside the Church.For the
CMRI there is known salvation outside the Church. BOD, BOB and I.I are
exceptions to the old exclusivist ecclesiiology of the Church. So the
CMRI theological position is the same as the liberals and the Vatican
Curia. This is modernism.
For
me there is only the old ecumenism of return since there is no known
salvation outside the Church.Vatican Council II is not a rupture with
Tradition.They are not a rupture with Quanta Cura, Syllabus of Errors, Mystici Corporis etc.
_________________________________
V. MODERN HIERARCHY OF THE VATICAN II CHURCH: In the light of the above,
it must be concluded that the modern hierarchy who have approved and
implemented the errors of Vatican II no longer represent the Catholic
Church and her lawful authority.
Lionel:
They are interpreting magisterial documents with visible BOD, BOB and
I.I just like the CMRI. So Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with
Tradition. The fault lies with the false premise ( visible cases of
BOD,BOB and I.I) and not Vatican Council II.I interpret Vatican Council
II differently.
_________________________________
This most certainly includes the one who confirmed, approved, decreed,
and implemented these heretical teachings, namely Paul VI (Montini).
Likewise included are his successors, namely, John Paul II (Wojtyla),
Benedict XVI (Ratzinger), and Francis (Bergoglio), who have continued to
implement these heretical teachings.
Lionel: The heretical teachings emerge when BOD,BOB and I.I are considered to be known people saved outside the Church. This was the mistake of the popes and also of Bishop Pirvanus and the CMRI community.
__________________________________
Despite the lack of canonical warning and formal declaration of loss of
office, their repeated acts of ecumenism and their enforcement of the
heresies of Vatican II and the new code of Canon Law, which are
injurious to faith and morals, are manifestations of their pertinacity
in heresy.
Lionel:
They support these actions with the New Theology. According to the New
Theology there are exceptions to the dogma EENS, so Feeneyite EENS is
rejected.Since there is salvation outside the Church, for the hierarchy
and the CMRI, there is the new ecumenism, the Anonymous Christian
etc.The Vatican accepts it and the CMRI reject it both use the same New
Theology.
___________________________________
THEREFORE, as the First Vatican Council infallibly teaches: “‘Thou art
Peter; and upon this rock I will build My Church,’ these words are
proven true by actual results, since in the Apostolic See the Catholic
religion has always been preserved untainted...the See of St. Peter
always remains unimpaired by any error, according to the divine promise
of Our Lord.” Further, since John Paul II has manifestly taught heresy,
promoted ecumenism and fostered interfaith worship, he clearly cannot be
recognized as a successor of St. Peter in the primacy.
Lionel:
John Paul II like the CMRI did not correct the BOD, BOB and I.I mistake
in the Catholic Church. I avoid the error and so for me Vatican Council
II has no exceptions to EENS.
I also affirm EENS without the irrationality.
I also affirm the Nicene Creed without the irrationality.
I affirm Mystici Corporis,the Catechism of Pius X and the Catechism of Trent without the irrationality.
The CMRI cannot say the same.
_______________________
VI. THE NEW CODE OF CANON LAW: In order to implement the teachings of
Vatican II, it was necessary that the modernists change the Code of
Canon Law (1917), as it contradicted their designs by reflecting the
mind of the Church in her past doctrine and discipline. The new code
contains a matter which should be most disturbing to the informed
Catholic. According to the new law of the Modern Church, non-Catholics
can, under certain circumstances, petition the “sacraments” from a
Catholic priest (without the non-Catholic abjuring his heretical
beliefs), and the priests must administer them. The Council of Florence,
as well as the 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 731), strictly forbids
this.
THEREFORE, as the universal laws of the Church are protected by her
infallibility and cannot impose obligations opposed to faith and morals,
the New Code must be considered as lacking all force of law. Moreover,
it has been promulgated by those who no longer represent Catholic
authority.
Lionel:
The New Code of Canon Law sadly accomodates invisible baptism of desire
as being a visible exception to EENS.This error was implemented by
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
__________________________
VII. COURSE FOR TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC PRIESTS: Due to the unprecedented
situation in the Catholic Church and the moral responsibility of the
faithful to receive certainly valid sacraments, traditional priests most
certainly can and must continue the mission of the Catholic Church by
sanctifying the faithful through the offering of the Holy Sacrifice of
the Mass, the administration of the Sacraments, and other pastoral
works. The mind of the Church is that “the salvation of the people is
the supreme law.” The 1917 Code of Canon Law will continue to be the
priests’ guideline.
Lionel
: The 1917 Code of Canon Law I would assume supports Feeneyite EENS and
does not assume there is known salvation outside the Church.The New
Code of Canon Law assumes Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong and the Holy
Office 1949 was correct.
-Lionel Andrades
http://www.cmri.org/why-we-believe-the-chair-of-peter-is-vacant.shtml
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/03/without-irrational-interpretation-of.html
No comments:
Post a Comment