The SSPX statement is ambigous, fawning and specious. How far they have come from the teachings of Archbishop Lefebvre, on moral issues

The Open Letter to Bishops on heresy on moral issues during the present pontificate, was documented well.
This is  not mentioned in the un-signed Statement of the Society of St. Pius X posted on the SSPX, USA website.
The SSPX are Cushingites,like the liberals, and interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, when it is not.So not much could be expected from them.
Security and not the faith is their priority.They seem to want to serve God and money at the same time.

Their superficial statement shows the need for them to go back to the Church Fathers and saints and read the medieval popes on morals.

Like cardinals Baldiserri and Battista the SSPX also chooses not to interpret magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, with Feeneyite philosophy and theology.Since then they would have to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They are neither  Feeneyite on Vatican Council II or  EENS and so they can can ask for canonical recognition.

It is a mortal sin of faith when the SSPX does not proclaim the dogma EENS, like the 2012 SSPX General Chapter Statement.EENS has been defined by three popes in three different Church Councils.

It is a mortal sin of faith when the SSPX changes the Nicene and Apostles Creed with allegedly known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).

It is a mortal sin of faith when the SSPX outright rejects the Athanasius Creed which does not state that the baptism of desire refers to known and visible people saved outside the Church.So there were no exceptions to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.These are all sins of disbelief.

SSPX traditionalists who differ from the St Benedict Center traditionalists, indicate, one of the two groups are in mortal sin and are not really traditionalists.

Brother Andre Marie MICM at the SBC does not use an irrational interpretation of BOD, BOB and I.I to change the understanding of EENS , the Creeds and Catechisms and Vatican Council II.

It is formal heresy when the dogma EENS is rejected or changed with an irrationality, the Athanasius Creed made obsolete, the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed is understood differently and Vatican Council II is interpreted as a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms, when it is not.

Archbishop Lefebvre and the popes since his time, have made the same mistake.This is really an official rupture with the Extraordinary and Ordinary Magisterium of the past.

The SSPX Statement asks what are the qualifications of the signatories of the Open Letter to the Bishops as if Catholics with academic qualifications will speak the truth and upset ecclesiastical Masonry.

The SSPX Statement does not also affirm the Faith on the issue of faith and salvation.

Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops were correct in saying that Vatican Council II ( when interpreted with Cushingism only) was a rupture with Tradition.Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell the SSPX that Vatican Council II, interpreted with Feeneyism was a not a rupture with Tradition( EENS, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc).

The SSPX statement is ambigous, fawning and specious. How far they have come from the teachings of Archbishop Lefebvre, on moral issues.He was honest and clear.

-Lionel Andrades

May 18, 2019

 

SSPX priests here in Italy are to afraid to discuss this. They do not want to displease Econe and create personal problems for themselves. How can they say that Archbishop Lefebvre made an objective mistake? How can they say that they were wrong about Vatican Council II these 50 years? How can they say that they were wrong on EENS too since there are no known cases of the baptism of desire etc in our human reality for them to be exceptions to EENS.The SSPX is part of the doctrinal problem in the Catholic Church

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/sspx-priests-here-in-italy-are-to.html

 

https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/regarding-open-letter-bishops-catholic-church-47886