Repost : With the Lionel Andrades model in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, liberal religious communities and even cardinals and bishops may end up in the same position as the Society of St. Pius X. They may want to reject Vatican Council II.

 SEPTEMBER 12, 2018

With the Lionel Andrades model in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, liberal religious communities and even cardinals and bishops may end up in the same position as the Society of St. Pius X. They may want to reject Vatican Council II.

With the Lionel Andrades model in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, liberal religious communities  and even cardinals and bishops may end up in the same position as the Society of St. Pius X. They may want to reject Vatican Council II.

This would also include the cardinal and archbishops at the Ecclesia Dei and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).

Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are acceptable to cardinals Sean o Malley, Vince Nicols and others, since they assume that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They accept the reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
With the L.A model BOD is not rejected since it is invisible in the present times. It is accepted as being hypothetical.So it is not an exception to EENS. This was the understanding of the Church for centuries.

This is a different way of looking at this issue and yet it is the old way.

The liberal cardinals and bishops cannot reject it.They cannot say that they will not accept a hypothetical BOD, BOB and I.I.Since BOD, BOB and I.I can only be hypothetical.This is common knowledge.

They cannot say that they refuse to accept EENS without exceptions; EENS must have BOD, BOB and I.I with exceptions.But there are no practical exceptions.This is reality.

Do you think the liberal cardinals and bishops will accept Vatican Council II  with this hermeneutic of continuity with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors ?

Will they not reject Vatican Council II since it is no more a rupture with Tradition for them?  -Lionel Andrades



FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR / CLICK TO ACCESS

• Grafics (baptism of desire (1)
• Grafics (Exceptions) (1)
• Grafics (Fr.Leonard Feeney) (1)
• Gran Maestro della Gran Loggia Regolare d’Italia (GLRI) (1)
• Grapchics ( Time to Resign) (1)
• Graphics (98)
• Graphics ( Ad Gentes 7 (2)
• Graphics ( Back to the Basics) (2)
• Graphics ( Canon Law) (1)
• Graphics ( Joint Declaration with Lutherans on Justification) (1)
• Graphics ( Official interpretation of the Council without the error) (2)
• Graphics ( Redemptoris Missio) (1)
• Graphics (Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre) (1)
• Graphics (Baptism of Desire) (1)
• Graphics (Bp.Barron) (1)
• Graphics (Cushingism) (2)
• Graphics (Ecumenism) (2)
• Graphics (LOHO) (2)
• Graphics (Mixed) (2)
• Graphics (Primer on Feeneyism and Cushingism ) (1)
• Graphics (Principle of Non Contradiction Violated) (1)
• Graphics (Professors ask seminarians/students to choose Feeneyism ) (1)
• Graphics (Sedevacantism) (2)
• Graphics (Social Reign of Christ the King) (3)
• Graphics (SSPX) (2)
• Graphics (Traditionalists) (2)
• Graphics (Vatican Council II and Mission) (1)
• Graphics Gospel of St.John (4)
• Graphics-Decide (6)
• Graphics-VC 2 says outside the Church no salvation) (3)
• Graphics( Archdiocese of Palermo) (1)
• Graphics( CDF and Traditonalists on interpretation of Vatican Council II) (1)
• Graphics( Hell) (1)
• Graphics( VC2 and volcanic images)(1)
• Graphics(Fr.Leonard Feeney) (1)
• Graphics(LOHO) (2)
• Graphics(Mission) (1)
• Graphics(Misson) (2)
• Graphics(Mixed) (14)
• __________________________

Note 

When Ad Gentes 7 mentions :-

Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." (AG 7) It is an error . It comes from the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

Similarly when it states the following, it is also an error from the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.

Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him(AG 7)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/there-is-mistake-in-ad-gentes-7vatican.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/with-lionel-andrades-model-in.html