Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope Paul VI.
They also interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope John XXIII.
Today Faggioli and Winters choose to interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and EENS without Feeneyism.In this way they can create a rupture with the Athanasius Creed, which says outside the Church there is no salvation.
The Cushingite reasoning in Vatican Council II i.e those of the Council Fathers, is in an error.It cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This is itself could be sufficient reason, for some, to reject the Council.But in spite of the error,because of the nature of this particular error- which is mixing up what is invisible as visible,implicit as explicit,the Council can still be interpreted with Feeneyism and there is no rupture with the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church etc.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 22, 2019
Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/massimo-faggioli-michael-sean-winters.html
AUGUST 9, 2019
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment