The German youth at the Medugorje Youth Festival do not know that Lumen Gentium 8 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases. If it was explained to them and they understood, what would be the reaction, when they return home and inform their diocesan bishop.

 

The German youth at the Medugorje Youth Festival do not know that Lumen Gentium 8 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases. If it was explained to them and they understood, what would be the reaction, when they return home and inform their diocesan bishop.

 

Picture the German bishops being told that Vatican Council II supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), when LG 8 etc are not exceptions.They cannot be exceptions to EENS and yet this is how the German bishops and cardinals wrongly interpret the Council. They hide the truth, if they know it, from the youth.

How would the Germans bishops, or the Italian and English bishops, react when young people say that there were no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), in the past.So they choose to re-interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite and not Cushingite EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return and still attend Holy Mass in German.

There is no new revelation in Vatican Council II, they discover, contrary to what the German bishops have been proclaiming and teaching  at religions classes.

This would be German youth, re-interpreting Vatican Council II- no more liberal - and still attending the Novus Ordo Mass. There would be no rupture with Tradition for them. The ecclesiology of the Catholic Church would be the same for them before and after Vatican Council II.

They could also attend the Latin Mass but without the new ecclesiology as is being done today by the traditionalists.The Lefbvrist traditionalists attend the Latin Mass with the New Ecclesiology and then call the Mass the Traditional Latin Mass.There is a rupture with Tradition and this is not how the Magisterium interpreted salvation doctrine in the 16th century.

-Lionel Andrades