Chris Ferrara made a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and has been informed many times about this,instead of acknowledging the mistake and correcting the error, he is writing on every other subject under the sun, except the relevant one.
Ferrara wrote books on Vatican Council II in which he interpreted the Council with a false premise and then rejected the Council as being non traditional.Obviously with a false premise the conclusion would be non traditional.
The same mistake was made by Roberto dei Mattei in his book on Vatican Council II.Mattei, Lanzetta and Gherardino wrongly advised the Fransciscans of the Immaculate on Vatican Council II and the Traditional Latin Mass.
Now instead of acknowledging their mistake and correcting it, they keep writing on other subjects, allowing Catholics to be misled.
For me LG 8, LG14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc does not contradict the past ecclesiology. For me, UR 3 does not contradict an ecumenism of return. For me,LG 16 and GS 22 do not contradict Feeneyite EENS as it did for Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican.
For the traditionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM, Vatican Council II does not contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
For John Martignoni BOD,BOB and I.I are 'zero cases' and are not exceptions to EENS.
For Fr. Marco Hausmann in Rome there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I without the baptism of water, known to us humans.So what is it for Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei?
For Ann Barnhardt being saved in invincible ignorance exists only on paper.
Also for Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, BOD,BOB and I.I are not exceptions to EENS.
This means Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei have to change their interpretation of the Council.It is the same for Joseph Shaw, John Lamont, John Rao Thomas Pink and Gavin D'Costa.It is the same for the professors and priests at Oxford University. A change also has to be made by Cardinal Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
Chris Ferrara interprets Vatican Council II like the apologists at EWTN. He wrote a book, 'EWTN a Network gone wrong'. He now must show EWTN that there is a rational and different way to interpret the Council and it has a continuity with Tradition.
The Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), claim that Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past.This is a false statement from them.They interpret the Council, with the same false premise as Ferrara and Mattei, and so there is a rupture with the past ecclesiology,the Syllabus of Errors and Feeneyite EENS, which they do not affirm.
Are Ferrara and Mattei willing to affirm Vatican Council II and Feeneyite EENS?
Chris Ferrara was wrong on Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
TERMS CLARIFIED
Now instead of acknowledging their mistake and correcting it, they keep writing on other subjects, allowing Catholics to be misled.
For me LG 8, LG14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc does not contradict the past ecclesiology. For me, UR 3 does not contradict an ecumenism of return. For me,LG 16 and GS 22 do not contradict Feeneyite EENS as it did for Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican.
For the traditionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM, Vatican Council II does not contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
For John Martignoni BOD,BOB and I.I are 'zero cases' and are not exceptions to EENS.
For Fr. Marco Hausmann in Rome there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I without the baptism of water, known to us humans.So what is it for Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei?
For Ann Barnhardt being saved in invincible ignorance exists only on paper.
Also for Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, BOD,BOB and I.I are not exceptions to EENS.
This means Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei have to change their interpretation of the Council.It is the same for Joseph Shaw, John Lamont, John Rao Thomas Pink and Gavin D'Costa.It is the same for the professors and priests at Oxford University. A change also has to be made by Cardinal Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
Chris Ferrara interprets Vatican Council II like the apologists at EWTN. He wrote a book, 'EWTN a Network gone wrong'. He now must show EWTN that there is a rational and different way to interpret the Council and it has a continuity with Tradition.
The Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), claim that Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past.This is a false statement from them.They interpret the Council, with the same false premise as Ferrara and Mattei, and so there is a rupture with the past ecclesiology,the Syllabus of Errors and Feeneyite EENS, which they do not affirm.
Are Ferrara and Mattei willing to affirm Vatican Council II and Feeneyite EENS?
Chris Ferrara was wrong on Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
TERMS CLARIFIED
BOD(
Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who desires the
baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is allegedly saved
and now in Heaven)
BOB (Baptism of Blood. The case of unknown person who is in Heaven as a martyr without the baptism of water)
I.I (Invincible
ignorance: The case of an unknown non Catholics who is in Heaven
without faith and baptism and instead in invincible ignorance.)
LG 8 (
Lumen Gentium 8: The case of the unknown person saved outside the
Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth' or where the true
Church of Christ allegedly subsists.
LG 14 (Lumen
Gentium 14: Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who
desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is
allegedly saved and now in Heaven)
LG 16 (
Lumen Gentium 16: The case of the unknown person saved outside the
Church in invincible ignorance and who is now in Heaven without faith
and the baptism of water)
UR 3 (Unitatitis
Redintigratiio 3, Vatican Council II : The case of the unknown
Christian, who is saved in his religions without Catholic faith or the
baptism of water in the Catholic Church and is allegedly known to
someone on earth who has seen him or her in Heaven).
NA 2(
Nostra Aetate 2: The case of the unknown non Catholic saved outside
the Catholic Church without faith and baptism. He or she is saved with
good and holy things in other religion or with the a ray of that Truth
which enlightens all mankind.
GS 22 (Gaudium
et Specs 22. The case of the unknown non Catholic who is saved outside
the Catholic Church. He or she is saved without faith and baptism but
with goodwill.
____________________________________
NOVEMBER 11, 2019
The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council II based upon a false premise. A deceptive rupture is created with Catholic Tradition
OCTOBER 31, 2019
EWTN's Tragic Errors of Leonard Feeney by Fr. William Most present arguments which cannot be practical exceptions to EENS, they cannot violate Newton's Laws of Physics
OCTOBER 30, 2019
There is a fundamental mistake in the theology of Vatican Council II. We have to reconcile ourselves with this.The Council Fathers blew it.They made an elementary mistake violating the laws of physics.Upon a false premise and inference they created a new theology. Then the periti, after 1965, upheld the false narrative.Until today, it's all a secret for them, especially for Pope Benedict. Pope Benedict is still hiding the truth.
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Such
a staggering thought.All those thousands of books, numerous, written on
Vatican Council II have a major theological error. They should be
thrown into the dustbin- O'Malley, Kasper, Faggioli,Gherardini,Mattei,
Ferrara.They violate Newton's laws of physics and Aristotle's Principle
of Non Contradiction.
OCTOBER 29, 2019
The 16 books of Vatican Council II have an error. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. The Council Fathers misunderstood the laws of physics. They wrongly assumed the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) referred to physical bodies in time and space. They they created a new false theology based upon this irrationality. This cannot be magisterial but is human error. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make a factual and objective error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-16-books-of-vatican-council-ii-have.html
OCTOBER 28, 2019
When I say that the baptism of desire (BOD), Baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) are not objective people in 2019, I refer to physics. Physics refers to stationary and moving bodies, acceleration,gravity, force etc.According to Newton's Laws of Physics we humans cannot see someone saved outside the Church with BOD, BOB and I.I ?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/when-i-say-that-baptism-of-desire-bod.html
OCTOBER 28, 2019
BOD, BOB and I.I and EENS and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2019. They are not objective people in the present times.This is a reality every rational adult and professional has to accept. This is the objective understanding of a reality shared by people in general. So if a professional denies it, something is wrong.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/bod-bob-and-ii-and-eens-bod-bob-and-ii.html
OCTOBER 28, 2019
Repost : Books to avoid - Fenton and Hardon's theology is off the rails
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/repost-books-to-avoid-fenton-and.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
____________________________________________
November 12, 2019
Gavin D'Costa's book published by the Oxford University Press has a philosophical and theological flaw
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment