There are three canonists appointed by Pope Francis to oversee the Franciscans of the Immaculate and all three interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), with a false premise,to create a rupture with Tradition.

There are three canonists appointed by Pope Francis to oversee the Franciscans of the Immaculate and all three interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), with a false premise,to create a rupture with Tradition. Without the irrational premise, the Council would support the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and 16th century EENS.

The canonists imply  that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church.Since if BOD, BOB and I.I are not referred to people known, who are saved outside the Church, how can they be exceptions to traditional EENS? Invisible people cannot be exceptions to the traditional teaching, on the Church having a superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.

And if there are no exceptions to EENS it means the canonisists support the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
 

The three canonists and Cardinal Braz de Avez  expect all the religious of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, both groups, to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc as a rupture with the past ecclesiology, even though there are no visible cases of LG 8 etc in 2019.

Ironically, the religious of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, are already interpreting LG 8 etc irrationally.

They interpret all magisterial documents irrationally and there is no clarification from the Sisters of the Franciscans of the Immaculates or the Friars.

This was an innocent mistake also made by Fr. Stefano Mannelli F.I.

The Franciscans of the Immaculate need to issue a clarification and correct the theological and philosophical error, in coordination with the Commissar Fr. Sabino Ardito.

It needs to be said in public that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 and the rest of Vatican Council II do not contradict  16th century EENs, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return and that BOD, BOB and I.I are not practical and literal examples of known salvation outside the Catholic Church.So they do not contradict Feeneyite EENS.

The Holy Office 1949 made an objective and factual mistake. Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center were correct.

-Lionel Andrades