Lumen Gentium 8 is always invisible.
Unitatis Redintigratio 3 always refers to an invisible person in the present times.
Gaudium et Specs 22 always refers to an unknown person.
Nostra Aetate 2 always refers to a hypothetical case.
So Vatican Council II no where contradicts the traditional teaching on the Church having an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.
The Amazon Synod Working Paper was wrong when it rejected exclusive salvation based upon Vatican Council II.
Pope Francis made an error in the Abu Dhabi Declaration when he rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, based upon Vatican Council II.
He also made an error in Lumen Fidei. 1
Pope Benedict made an error when he said extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) today ( March 2016, Avvenire) was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century since there was a development with Vatican Council II.
Then the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia, made an error when they asked Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 847-848) as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.
The popes and cardinals at the Vatican are constantly interpreting Lumen Gentium 8 as not always being invisible.
Unitatis Redintigratio 3 does not always refer to an invisible person in the present times.
Gaudium et Specs 22 does not always refer to an unknown person.
Nostra Aetate 2 does not always refers to a hypothetical case.Since LG 8, UR 3, GS 22, NA 2 are exceptions to EENs for them.
They are exceptions since they are visible people. Invisible people cannot be exceptions.
So they irrationally interpret the Council and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades
1
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment