Pope Francis and Pope Benedict continue interpret Vatican Council II as follows.
Lumen Gentium 8 is not always an invisible case, it is visible.So it is an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Lumen Gentium 16 does not always refer to an invisible person, but to someone visible.So LG 16 is an exception to the past ecclesiology.
Gaudium et Specs 22 does not not always refer to an unknown person, but someone visible.
Unitatis Redintigratio 3 does not always refer to a hypothetical, speculative and unknown case. So UR 3 contradicts an ecumenism of return.
Nostra Aetate 2 does not always refer to a hypothetical case but some real and known person who is saved outside the Church.So non Christians do not always need to convert into the Catholic Church.
Lumen Gentium 14 does not always refer to a speculative case but some one saved in invincible ignorance etc outside the Church.LG 14 contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX.
So for them Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) for the present two popes and the Left.
With this irrationality, Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Athanasius Creed on outside the Church there is no salvation.
Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, on exclusive salvation in the Church and an also an ecumenism of return.
Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Nicene Creed which does not say, 'I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire, blood and invincible ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Apostles Creed which refers to the Holy Spirit and the Catholic Church.The Holy Spirit has always taught the Church that outside the Church there is no salvation.
But for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict and the Left this would be 'triumphalism'. So they reject this Magisterial teaching of the Church. The popes reject the Magisterium.
This is heresy.First class heresy.
It is an impediment to offering Holy Mass.
It is a scandal.
To offer Holy Mass in this condition, without ending the scandal, could be a sacrilege for them.
St. Alphonsus Liguri, Father of Moral Theology says that if a priest in manifest mortal sin offers Holy Mass, do not go up to receive the Eucharist from him. In his Teologia Moralis, Book 3, he says , if you do go up to receive the Eucharist you would be telling him all is well and cooperating in his sin.
He writes that unless it is an emergency, like not being able to fulfill ones Sunday obligation, and there is no other church nearby, do not go up to receive the Eucharst .
What do we do when the present two popes are in manifest mortal sins of faith?-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment