October 5, 2019
Prof.Giovanni Tangorra teaches an Ecclesiology course at St.John Lateran University, Rome : He interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism to create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition - 2
OCTOBER 5, 2019
Continued
It
needs to be remembered that with Anti-Semitism and other Leftist laws,
Professor Giovani Tangorra, would not be allowed to teach that there is
exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.So he interprets Vatican
Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
He officially has to create a hermeneutic of rupture.
So it could have been a relief for him when he writes in bold text and with an exclamation point :
The Church of Pope Paul VI is Christological!
He is correct. With Cushingism, Vatican Council II rejects exclusive salvation. So it supports 'Christ yes, Church no, or not always'.
Christ is needed for salvation but for the John Lateran University the
Church is not'.So ecclesiology restricts itself to Christ as the
Saviour separated from the Church.
This is not traditional and is an obvious rupture, for example, with the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century.This error is now official in the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod.
If
the professor of ecclesiology had chosen to interpret Vatican Council
II with Feeneyism his conclusion would be different. There would be no
hermeneutic of rupture with the past ecclesiology.
The
Left would protest and call it fundamentalist etc and he would lose
his teachng position.Now the Left does not protest when the Synod
Working Paper suggests:-
1.
Amazonian diversity, which is above all religious diversity, evokes a
new Pentecost (IL 30): respect for this diversity means to recognize
that there are other paths to salvation, without reserving salvation
exclusively to the Catholic faith. Non-Catholic Christian groups teach
other modalities of being Church, without censures, without dogmatism,
without ritual disciplines and ecclesial forms (IL
138); the Catholic Church ought to integrate these modalities.
Reserving salvation exclusively to the Creed is destructive of the Creed
(IL 39).1
So
the professor prudently interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism
i.e the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in
invincible ignorance, refer to personally known non Catholics saved
outside the Church.In this way they become exceptions to the past
ecclesiology and a new ecclesiology is created.There are practical exceptons to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
The
dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors are made
obsolete.There is no more the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of
return.
LG
8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to seen- in -the- flesh-
cases- of non Catholics saved without faith and baptism. There is a new
ecclesiology.
Common
sense tells us that there are no known cases of non Catholics saved
outside the Church with BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8, GS 22 etc.But without
this ruse the popes from Paul VI could not change ecclesiology and create a break with Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
1
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment