Pope Benedict has interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference in his books and they should be removed. He could write new books on Vatican Council II.

Pope Benedict has interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference in his books and they should be removed. He could write new books on Vatican Council II. He could avoid the irrationality and so interpret the Council with the hermeneutic of continuity with the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

It would dishonesty for him to maintain his articles on line on ecclesiology in which he interpreted LG 8, LG 14 and LG 16 as referring to visible and personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church. So he then projected Lumen Gentium as a break with the past ecclesiology of the Church. 
Invisible people cannot be exceptions to the past ecclesiology. He needed exceptions.Otherwise there could not be a new theology, new ecclesiology, new ecumenism, new canon law and new evangelisation.

In most of his books, if not all, this error is there since there is a reference to Vatican Council II.

He has also influenced numerous authors to write books on the Council with the same objective error.

Without the false premise and inference there would be no known salvation outside the Church and so no theological basis for the new ecumenism of Pope Benedict.

The Italian President Sergio Mattarella interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and inference found in Pope Benedict's writing and has praised Chiara Lubich on her death anniversart. Chiara an inspiring and wonderful person and an excellent example of a Catholic, was following the false theology of Pope Benedict and so supported the new ecumenism.

Similarly the other lay movements have read Pope Benedict's articles and books, and interpret the Council with the same irrationality as the good Focolarinis, to create a rupture with Catholic Tradition.

These articles and books on line are misleading and should be removed. 

Ignatius Press could ask Pope Benedict to write new books on Vatican Council II in which he does not interpret Lumen Gentium as being a break with the past ecclesiology and does not see Unitatitis Redintigratio ( Decree on Ecumenism) contradicting the old ecumenism of return.-Lionel Andrades

JANUARY 30, 2020

The only blog which is standing against all of them

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-only-blog-which-is-standing-against.html

JANUARY 29, 2020

It is unethical for Pope Benedict to keep this article in German on line and mislead people. Similarly it is unethical for Ferrara and Mattei to keep promoting their books with the error.This is dishonesty.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/it-is-unethical-for-pope-benedict-to.html


This is the only blog which is holding out against all of them. The only person standing against all of them.The only person who has stumbled on to their secret and is standing in their way.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/german-bishops-go-ahead-with-their.html