If Michael Matt and Michael Voris affirmed Vatican Council II rationally it would not be acceptable for the supporters of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, religious and secular

I am not allowed to comment on Michael Matt's Remnant website, since for me the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to hypothetical cases only and so are not exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). He cannot say the same.BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS for him. So he implies that they are literal cases, practically known in the present times for them to be exceptions to EENS.

 If he spoke the truth they would accuse him of being a Feeneyite on EENS.

I am banned from commenting  even by Michael Voris.Since for me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  refer to hypothetical cases only.So they cannot be exceptions to  the strict interpretation of EENS. For Michael Voris and Christine Niles they are exceptions. This  'magisterial'.They have to follow the alleged magisterium', right or wrong. In this case they are wrong and this error is not magisterial. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. This is human error.

Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II not with the rational premise, inference and concluion.He used the irrational option, to create a rupture with Tradition.They also have to follow the political process,ADL, SPLC etc.

They have seen the graphic models with the irrational premise, inference and conclusion 1 and those with the rational premise, inference and conclusion.2

They know I am correct.

But they will not affirm the faith honestly.

It's laughable for me, when they criticize Pope Francis. What difference does it make if Bishop Athanasius Schneider thinks  Pope Francis is the pope and not Pope Benedict ? Bishop Schneider interpretd official Church texts with irrationality to create heresy.Neither he nor his secretary denies this.If they denied it they know there would implications.This would not be acceptable for Pope Francis. 

Similarly if Michael Matt and Michael Voris affirmed Vatican Council II rationally it would not be acceptable for the supporters of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, religious and secular.-Lionel Andrades

1

  

2

 

 

FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR.CLICK TO ACCESS

• Model Rational and Irrational Marco Tosatti and La Stampa (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational (45)
• Model-Rational and Irrational - back to the past with one step (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational - Legion of Christ Universities (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational -George Weigel (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational -Jewish Left Rabbis approve (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational Andrea Tornielli and Vatican (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational Bologna School Alberto Melloni (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational Croation Government (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational John Allen JR and Crux (1)
• Model-Rational and Irrational Mons.Marco Gnarvi Vicariate Rome (1)

MARCH 1, 2020

This is unethical for the U.S State Department and the U.S Foreign Sevice

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/this-is-unethical-for-us-state.html