February 24, 2020
Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia , Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Mons Marco Gnarvi, Diocesan Secretary for the Office of Inter religious Dialogue and Ecumenism, Rome Vicariate are in schism with the popes over the centuries . They use an irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create this schism.With this irrationality they have also changed the understanding of the Creeds and Catechism and this is heresy.
Archbishops
Giacomo Morandi and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia , Secretaries of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Mons Marco Gnarvi,
Diocesan Secretary for the Office of Inter religious Dialogue and
Ecumenism, Rome Vicariate are in schism with the popes over the
centuries .
They
use an irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create this
schism.With this irrationality they have also changed the understanding
of the Creeds and Catechism and this is heresy.
They
do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so avoid heresy on
extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27 Q),
the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (
outside the Church there is no salvation).An artificial rupture is
created with Tradition which is supported by Pope Benedict and Pope
Francis.-
SO THIS IS HERESY
1
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/on-charging-a-pope-with-heresy
HERESY LIST
1. So EENS is contradicted and so is John 3:5, Mark 16 :16 etc.
2.
The Nicene Creed is contradicted.( I believe in more than one known
baptism for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of
water in the Catholic Church).
3.The
Apostles Creed is re-interpreted ( I believe in the Holy Spirit which
teaches the Catholic Church today according to the two popes that there
is known salvation outside the Church).
4.The Athanasius Creed is rejected( Outside the Church there is no salvation).
This is all first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
What
the past Magisterium has infallibly defined to be “divinely revealed”
is rejected or changed by the present two popes and the Vatican Curia
and the Rome Vicariate.
THE EVIDENCE
1.The evidence is
there for Pope Benedict's heresies in the theological papers of the
International Theological Commission.It is there in black and white.It
is followed by the Archbishops at the CDF and the Rome Vicariate.
2 They
are approved by Pope Francis.The same irrational reasoning was used at
the Plaquet Deo Press Conference by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
2. Pope
Francis on the plane when asked about his Abu Dhabi statement did not
affirm the dogma EENS. Instead he projected Vatican Council II(
interpreted with the irrationality) as a rupture with EENS.This was a
rejection of EENS.
3. He has officially presented a kerygma in Evangelii Gaudium without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church.
4.Today if he is asked he will not affirm EENS like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.This is further proof.
He
can recite the Nicene or Apostles Creed but he will interpret them
with the irrational premise and inference which is creates a rupture
with their understanding over the centuries.So his reciting the Creeds
is meaningless.
5. During the pontificate of Pope Francis, Pope Benedict confirmed that EENS was
no more, for Pope Francis, like it was for the missionaries in the 16th
century. There was 'a development' with Vatican Council II.He meant
Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise and
inference.Otherwise there could not be a development.So EENS and the
Creeds were changed in their meanings. The original strict
interpretation was denied.
6. Pope Francis does not ask Pope Benedict to issue a correction saying EENS today is like it was for the Magisterium in the 16th century.There is no development with Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrationality.
They are both guilty. So we cannot expect a Catholic proclamation of the faith.
7. So with EENS and Nicene, Apostles andAthanasius Creeds changed theologically there are new heretical doctrines. They are there in the new ecumenism, new ecclesiology, newevangelisation and
joint mission with other Christian communities who are not outside the
Church for the two popes.There is a new understanding of mission in
which everyone does not need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation(
since there are known exceptions for the two popes).
8.The
new doctrines are heretical and practical conclusions of a new
theology based upon a false premise and inference. So now heresy is the
norm in the Church supported by the present two popes.
9.They
interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with the irrational
reasoning. So BOD, BOB and I.I contradict EENS.BOD, BOB and I.I would
also contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q ) and other
magisterial documents.This is schism with the past popes.
SO THIS IS HERESY
1.So
there is a denial of traditional EENS by Pope Francis which is
confirmed in public by Pope Benedict.Pope Pius XII called EENS an
'infallible teaching'(Letter of the Holy Office 1949). So this is heresy.
2.Since
both popes interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to known people
saved outside the Church, they have rejected the Athanasius Creed which
says outside the Church there is no salvation. This is heresy.
3.With
seen- in- the- flesh cases of BOD, BOB and I.I(otherwise they cannot be
exceptions to EENS) for the present two popes they have changed the
meaning of the Nicene Creed to ,'I believe in three or more known
baptisms, desire, blood and invincible ignorance... and they exclude the
baptism of water in the Catholic Church'. This is first class heresy.
4.Since
BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church(
otherwise they could not be exceptions to EENS according to the 16th
century) the Catechism of Pope Pius X is contradicted when it says that
all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
The
Catechisms would also contradict themselves with the use of the
pontiff's irrationality.They would be contradicting EENS and the Creeds
according to the 16th century. This is heresy.
5.Vatican
Council II can be interpreted with hypothetical cases just being
hypothetical and not objectively known people saved outside the Church.
Then Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with EENS according to
the Magisterium of the 16th century.But this is not the interpretation
of the two pontiffs. This is heresy.
They intentionally interpret Vatican Council II with a hermeneutic of
rupture with Tradition( past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return, Syllabus
of Errors, Creeds and Catechism).
6.Dominus
Iesus and Redemptoris Missio was written assuming that BOD, BOB and I.I
referred to known people saved outside the Church.So there was salvation outside
the Church. This is irrational but this is the basis of the New
Theology.Possibilities and theoretical cases are assumed to be practical
exceptions to EENS in the present times(2019). With the New Theology
Dominus Iesus and Redemptoris Missio do not affirm exclusive salvation
in the Catholic Church and so they are a rupture with Tradition( 16th
century EENS, past ecclesiology).A heretical theology creates new
doctrines.They are heretical.They are expressed in the new ecumenism(
in which Protestants do not need to convert), a new ecclesiology( in
which there is salvation outside the church), new mission( in which non
Catholics are saved in their religion since there is known salvation
outside the Church,possibilities are real people) etc.This is heretical doctrine.
7. With
visible- for- the- pontiff cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they have
re-interpreted St. Thomas Aquinas who was a Feeneyite. Aquinas affirmed
the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and knew that hypothetical
cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and the case of the unknown
catechumen, were not objective exceptions to EENS.The pontiffs
and the CDF also project St. Augustine. St. Francis of Assisi and the
other saints who affirmed exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, as
denying it.They deny it with alleged practical exceptions of BOD, BOB
and I.I.The saints are interpreted heretically.
So we have heresy in theology and doctrine and it is manifest. It can be corrected. This is why I mention it here.
Jimmy Akins states:
Summing Up( according to Jimmy Akins) 1
The
Open Letter has many other flaws, but its chief one is that it fails to
make the case that the present pope is guilty of heresy. To do that, it
would need to show the following:
- The Magisterium has infallibly defined some specific truth ( The Creeds and EENS.)
- It has infallibly defined that this specific truth is divinely revealed, creating a dogma (EENS and the Creeds)
- The pope has been baptized (that’s easy)
- The pope’s words or actions indicate that he refuses to believe the dogma (EENS was refuted at the Abu Dhabi meeting. It has been refuted many times with a Christian theology of religious pluralism. EENS is never affirmed in public )
- His words or actions cannot be understood in a way consistent with the dogma (This is documented in the The Open Letter with reference to EENS and Vatican Council II(Ad Gentes 7 )
- He does so obstinately (This is documented here in this report. The heresy is repeated.EENS, the Creed and Vatican Council II are re-interpreted as a rupture with Tradition.
The present two popes and the Prefect of the CDF need to recant and announce:-
1.Invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are not physically visible and personally known exceptions to EENS.So EENS today is not a rupture with EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
2.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
3.They can confirm that they personally do not know of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019 and neither do people in general know of such cases. If any one was saved as such it would only be known to God.Lionel Andrades
1.Invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are not physically visible and personally known exceptions to EENS.So EENS today is not a rupture with EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
2.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
3.They can confirm that they personally do not know of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019 and neither do people in general know of such cases. If any one was saved as such it would only be known to God.Lionel Andrades
1
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/on-charging-a-pope-with-heresy
MAY 8, 2019
It is formal heresy when the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is rejected, the Athanasius Creed is made obsolete, the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and Apostles Creed changed and Vatican Council II is wrongly interpreted as a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms by using a false premise and inference
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/archbishops-giacomo-morandi-and.html
No comments:
Post a Comment