Italian apologist Corrado Gnerre uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II. It is the same with Roberto dei Mattei's media. Radici Cristiane and Correspondnza Romano also interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise to create a false break with Tradition( EENS etc).
This could be a reason why they are not aware of how the popes since Paul VI have interpreted the Creeds differently. They make the same mistake as the popes.
There are no literal cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance. But the Italian apologists assume there are literal examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church. Then they make a New Theology upon this error.They start to discuss the conditions for LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as if they know of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.
This is approved by the Jewish Left.
But if the Italian apologists announce that there are no physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church and so LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only, the entire interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS change immediately.-Lionel Andrades.
But if the Italian apologists announce that there are no physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church and so LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only, the entire interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS change immediately.-Lionel Andrades.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment