The College of Cardinals and the popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and no one is doing anything about it.

The College of Cardinals and the popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and no one is doing anything about it.

There is the Vatican Council II of Pope Paul VI and the Vatican Council II of Lionel Andrades. The interpretation is different . I write this in humility.

There is an objective and factual difference between the two interpretations. and one is rational and the other irrational. The liberals, traditionalists and sedevacantists  follow the irrational interpretation of Pope Paul VI. I follow my own.

For me Vatican Council II (Lionel Andrades) is a not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q). But for Pope Benedict and Pope Francis there is a rupture with Tradition.

For me unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance  do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in 1949. 1965 or 2020.But for Pope Paul VI there were exceptions  to EENS. In other words  there are known cases of people saved outside the Church. They would have to be known, human beings, 
for them to be exceptions. 

This is irrational. But this is the official and common interpretation of the Council.

All the books on Vatican Council II use this false premise and inference and so their conclusion is different from mine.

So Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII were wrong on EENS. They assumed there were exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I for EENS.Instead Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct. There are no literal cases of BOD, BOB and I.I for them to be exceptions.

The interpretation of Lionel Andrades is magisterial since it is the teaching of the past popes, the saints and Vatican Council II interpretated rationally.The interpretation of Pope Paul VI, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis on this subject is not magisterial, since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. These popes have confused  what is implicit as being explicit, subjective as objective and invisible as visible.They had a rational choice but did not use it.

-Lionel Andrades