Michael Voris produced a critical video against Bishop Roberto Barron which was emotional. Instead he should have pointed out the simple facts.

 

Michael Voris produced a critical video against Bishop Roberto Barron which was emotional. Instead he should have pointed out the simple facts.

1. Bishop Barron interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference and so his conclusion is non traditional. Without this error Barron would have to affirm EENS and Tradition( Syllabus etc) like the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Centers, USA.

He would then be called Radical Traditionalist.

2.It is unethical and deceptive for the bishop to interpret the Creeds and Catechisms  with an irrationality and create a division in the Church, with the past Magisterium. His approach is false.

3. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the USCCB and Pope Francis must affirm Vatican Council II, EENS and other Magisterial documents( Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed etc) without the false premise and set a precedent for Bishop Robert Barron and the USCCB cardinals and Bishops to do the same.-Lionel Andrades