If you look at things from a Feeneyite-Cushingite perspective there is no traditionalist-liberal division. Since Cushingism is irrational and is the foundation for liberalism today. But the foundation for liberalism in the past was always Feeneyite.Tradition was always Feeneyite. So as a liberal, for example, Cardinal Walter Kasper cannot really cite Unitatis Redintigratio 3 (saved in imperfect communion with the Church ).Since UR 3 when Feeneyite would only be hypothetical and theoretical. It would no be an objective exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the theological basis for a New Ecumenism. Doctrines develop only with Cushingism

 If you look at things from a Feeneyite-Cushingite perspective there is no traditionalist-liberal division. Since Cushingism is irrational and is the foundation for liberalism today. But the foundation for liberalism in the past was always Feeneyite.Tradition was always Feeneyite. So as a liberal, for example, Cardinal Walter Kasper cannot really  cite Unitatis Redintigratio 3 (saved in  imperfect communion with the Church ).Since UR 3 when Feeneyite would only be hypothetical  and theoretical. It would no be an objective exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the theological basis for a New Ecumenism. Doctrines develop only with Cushingism. -Lionel Andrades