The Church, a few ecclesiastics, a made an objective mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case when they assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were objective and practical exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). The Church, a group of ecclesiastics, repeated the same mistake at Vatican Council II when they assumed that unknown and hypothetical cases, mentioned in LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NS 2, GS 22 etc,were objective and practical exceptions to the traditional interpretation of EENS. The Church, a small grop of cardinals and bishops also made a mistake when they allowed Holy Communion; the Eucharist,at Holy Mass, to be received in the hand instead of kneeling and on the tongue

 The Church, a few ecclesiastics, a made an objective mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case when they assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were objective and practical exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

The Church, a group of ecclesiastics, repeated the same mistake at Vatican Council II when they assumed that unknown and hypothetical cases, mentioned in LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NS 2, GS 22  etc,were objective and practical exceptions to the traditional interpretation of EENS.

The Church, a small group of cardinals and bishops also made a mistake when they allowed Holy Communion; the Eucharist,at Holy Mass, to be received in the hand instead of kneeling and on the tongue.-Lionel Andrades