Why are Dr. Taylor Marshall and Anthony Flanders still talking about Rahner, Kung and De Lubac, let the liberals do it.So what if Rahner, Kung and De Lubac were there at Vatican Council II.So what if they held various concepts ? Since if we do not use their false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Council returns back to Tradition to pre-Vatican Council II times.We go back to the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the missionaries of the 16th century

Why are Dr. Taylor Marshall and Anthony Flanders still talking about Rahner, Kung and De Lubac, let the liberals do it.So what if Rahner, Kung and De Lubac were there at Vatican Council II.So what if they held various concepts ? Since if we do not use their false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Council returns back to Tradition to pre-Vatican Council II times.We go back to the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the missionaries of the 16th century. -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 20, 2020

They do not make the connection between the Nouvelle théologie and the false premise

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/they-do-not-make-connection-between.html