John Henry Weston and Life Site News correspondents do not telling the truth about Vatican Council II. They hide information on the Council interpreted without the false premise. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Roberto dei Mattei, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Romano Amerio and many others cited on Life Site News made a mistake on Vatican Council II . They knew Vatican Council II was a break with Tradition, it had a New Theology, but they did not know the precise cause.
1.So they would interpret Vatican Council II with the New Theology and also criticize the New Theology.
2.They could not interpret Vatican Council II without the common false premise of the popes.
The precise cause of the break with Tradition was the false premise.Without the false premise the Council affirms the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus in Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and without the false premise , LG 8, LG 14, LG 6, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are not objective exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 or EENS.
This is the truth which John Henry Weston and Life Site News hides. -Lionel Andrades
John Henry Weston interviewing those who interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition, in particular 16th century EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
During their Rome trip they were not interested in the truth about Vatican Council II and how it can be interpreted with or without a false premise and the conclusion is non traditional or traditional.___________
Life Site News supports the teaching of the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Baltimore Catechism, with a false premise.
________________________
Life Site News and the Lefebvrists support the Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma by Ludwig Ott and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( see photo below).Both these books affirm the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO).
LOHO interpres the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with a false premise.
So a New Theology was created.
The past theology said outside the Church there is no salvation and the present one says there is salvation.
LOHO confused invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance etc, which could only be known to God, as being practical exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology.
They were seen as objective exceptions to the past teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
So with the confusion,
hypothetical ( LG 8 etc) cases were projected as as being objective. So a new theology was born.
By ignoring the New Theology and avoiding the false premise Life Site News could go back to the old theology of the Church.But it would not be Lefebvrist but Feeneyite.
___________________________
Now even the old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally. Where ever the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and the baptism of blood are mentioned, they are interpreted with the false premise. So they become practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional ecumenism of return.
The Syllabus of Errors is ma
de obsolete.
The liberals, Lefebvrists and Life Site News, make the same mistake.
This is official modernism. It makes the Oath Against Modernism, the Profession of Faith and Oath of the Bishop obsolete.
The heresy,schism and irrationality is the norm in the Catholic Church today.
There is no acknowledgement of the error or its correction.A recent report on Life Site News suggested going back to the old theological manuals. But how will you interpret them ? With or without the false premise ?
_________________________________________
There can be various methods to present the Catechism but the present doctrine and theology is wrong. It is a rupture with traditional Catechism.
The false premise is used to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. So the understanding is changed of Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms and the Creeds.
So now there can be new presentations but it is not the Deposit of the Faith. This error is not corrected on Life Site News especially,in the reports of Peter Kwasniewski.
___________
____________________________
The Old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally like the Catechism of the Catholic Church.So Fr. John Hardon is cited on Life Site News but it is not mentioned that he interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally like the liberals.
________
The Traditional Catechisms on the website Whispers of Restoration are interpreted with the false premise.
The website was supported by Peter Kwasniewski a correspondent of Life Site News.
______________
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/06/what-good-is-changing-catechism.html
Peter Kwasniewski interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church with the common irrationality. So there is 'a new revelation' in the Church for them at Life Sites.It contradicts the Bible and the old revelation of the Catholic Church.
Unknown and theoretical cases are presented as objective exceptions to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.
So Life Site News supports a development of doctrine based upon the false premise.They are liberals on this issue.
Kwasniewshi refuses to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus like St. Thomas Aquinas.
He also interprets Vatican Council II with the objective mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which contradicted EENS according to Aquinas.
.
Kwasniewski and Life Site News will criticize the New Theology and also use it to interpret Magisterial documents.
_____________
The Catechism of the Council of Trent refers to 'the desire thereof' which refers to an invisible case in 2021.It is always an invisible case.
It is always hypothetical.
If it exists it can only be known to God.
Yet the traditionalists interpret the Catechism of the Council of Trent (baptism of desire) as contradicting Feeneyite EENS.
This is irrational. With this error the New Theology is created.This is the theology of Life Site News.
_____________
The blurb is false. Since it depends upon how you interpret this Catechism.
Do you use a false premise or do you avoid it? Are you a Cushingite or Feeneyite? This is unknown to the correspondents of Life Site News.
Making this distinction before the interpretation, determines the conclusion.
It is the same with Vatican Council II.But this point is never mentioned on Life Site News. They simply refer to Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church as if there is only one interpretation.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment