John Salza and Robert Siscoe will not comment if the present two popes who interpret dogmas and de fide teachings with a 'loaded' premise and inference and so reject Tradition in general- can still be a pope ? Can a pope in public mortal sin ( rejecting the Athanasius Creed, changing the Nicene Creed, rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with alleged known exceptions, making the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX obsolete with the same error, interpreting Vatican Council II and all Catechisms irrationally, by confusing what is invisible as being visible) still be a pope ?

 John Salza and Robert Siscoe will not comment if the present two popes who interpret dogmas and de fide teachings with a 'loaded' premise and inference and so reject Tradition in general- can still be a pope ? Can a pope in public mortal sin ( rejecting the Athanasius Creed, changing the Nicene Creed, rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with alleged known exceptions, making the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX obsolete with the same error, interpreting Vatican Council II and all Catechisms irrationally, by confusing what is invisible as being visible) still be a pope ? - Lionel Andrades