Michael Voris has not mentioned that Fr. Georges de Laire interprets Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a false premise. Since the CMTV Staff make the same error

 Michael Voris has not mentioned that Fr. Georges de Laire interprets Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a false premise. Since the CMTV Staff make the same error.Voris like Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA does not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS. So CMTV continues to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with the false premise. This pleases the Vatican, the USCB and the Left who also project unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as objective exceptions to 16th century EENS.-Lionel Andrades

REPLY TO FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE 

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/reply-to-fr-georges-de-laire