Bishop Barron can no more criticize traditionalists since when he interprets Vatican Council II without the false premise then he becomes an 'extremist'

 

 Bishop Robert Barron follows Pope Francis' non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II and is giving talks on the Council.

He does not mention that Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano called for the rejection of Vatican Council II interpreted  with the false premise, inference and conclusion. Vatican Council II interpreted  without the false premise is Magisterial. It does not contradict the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church.It is not a rupture with Tradition ( EENS etc).

He calls, Catholics who do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the deceptive premise, as 'extremists'.

I attend Holy Mass in Italian. I am a supporter of the lay movements and Medugorje. I attend the Latin Mass when possible but I interpret Vatican Council II  with the rational premise, inference and conclusion. So the ecclesiology of the Church has not changed for me.

Mission is still traditional since all non Catholics are oriented to Hell with no known exceptions for me. It is not only those 'who know'(LG 14) who are oriented to Hell.In general there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), defined by three Church Councils,  and so all non Catholics need  faith and baptism in the Catholic Church to go to Heaven.

For me inter faith marriages are adultery since the non Catholic spouse is outside the Church and is on the way to Hell.While the Catholic spouse is living in adultery.Both should not receive the Eucharist in this irregular situation.

For me it would be a sin if I did not vote for a political party which supports the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics ( example Militia Christ, Forza Nuova etc) and instead voted for a secular-Satanic , or liberal-Satanic political party which promotes abortion, homosexual marrages etc. 

So I do not have to go for only the Latin Mass to be considered conservative. I can attend the Novus Ordo Mass and affirm the strict interpretation of EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II.Similarly I do not have to believe only those ' who know' will go to Hell. I can affirm traditional Mission doctrine and still go for Mass in Italian.

I can affirm hypothetical for us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance along with the strict interpretation of EENS. I do not have to choose. It is not either-or.

Bishop Barron can no more criticize only the traditionalists since when he interprets Vatican Council II without the false premise then he becomes an 'extremist'.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 22, 2021

Bishop Robert Barron interpreted Vatican Council II with a fake premise and received the 1.5 million Templeton Grant

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/bishop-robert-barron-interpreted.html