John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School whose secretary is Alberto Melloni and President Alessandro Panjo, annually receives a million euros from the present Leftist Italian government it has been reported. Since they unethically interpret the Council with a false premise instead of the rational alternative they are eligible for the funds.
With the rational premise, inference and conclusion there would be no rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed( outside the Church no salvation), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( ecumenism of return) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q,27Q-other religions are not paths to salvation and their members need to convert into the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water(AG 7) to avoid Hell).However with the rational premise Alberto Melloni would not be able to receive funds from the Government.Since the Council would be politically incorrect with the Left.
The FSCIRE has Alberigo School for Advanced Religious Studies which interprets the Council with the fake premise and so suggests that there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church.
The FSCIRE also has the Andreatta College was acquired by the University of Bologna and subsequently loaned to the Foundation until 2049 .In 2012 the Communist President of Italy Giorgio Napolitano renamed the College .The College guarantees world-class facilities to scholars from Italy and around the world.The College accommodates doctoral and post-doctoral students as well as visiting scholars from European institutes of higher learning according to the FSCIRE website.
The activities of this institution are controversial since they provide false information to the students on Vatican Council II and support a political and non Magisterial interpretation of the Council.
Their Scientific Committee would be aware that it is false to project a false premise to create a non real inference at Newton's level of physics and then conclude that there are objective to the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the 16th century.
Inspite of the discovery of the fraud New Age and Leftist groups are still promoting Chardin.
Fake premise
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/who-we-are/board-of-trustees/
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/alberigo-school-for-advanced-religious-studies/
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/andreatta-college/
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/who-we-are/scientific-committee/
_______________________
FEBRUARY 26, 2021
The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi accepts Prof. Alberto Melloni's official interpretation of Vatican Council II which is dishonest
The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi accepts Prof. Alberto Melloni's official interpretation of Vatican Council II which is dishonest.
Melloni like Dragi unethically uses a false premise to make Vatican Council II emerge as a rupture with the Italy's popes and saints over history. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 7, 2021
Prof.Alberto Melloni's interpretations are obsolete
Move over Prof.Alberto Melloni.Your system is antiquated, outdated. Obsolete. -Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 7, 2020
If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition
If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue
FEBRUARY 22, 2020
The Italian government is funding Alberto Melloni's John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the headquarters of the so-called "Bologna School,"1 guaranteed another yearly million-euro funding for 2020–2022.Melloni uses the irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II. It is only with a false premise, inference and conclusion that he makes the Council a rupture with Tradition. He could choose the rational premise, inference and conclusion.
_________________________________________
___________________________________________
With this rational model, the Vatican, the Bologna School, Archbishop Pegro and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi , would not be contradicting the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
ATHANASIUS CREED
'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'
___________________________________
___________________________________
SUNDAY, MARCH 8, 2020
Repost : The political party Lega Salvini needs to take up the issue in the Italian Senate of the Italian priests Fathers Riccardo Petroni, Matteo Riboli, Lorenzo Mazzetti di Pietralata, Emanuele Lonardi and Enrico D'Urso deprived of the status of being a priest and made lay men, by Archbishop Peregro in Ferrara, who rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican
MARCH 4, 2020
The political party Lega Salvini needs to take up the issue in the Italian Senate of the Italian priests Fathers Riccardo Petroni, Matteo Riboli, Lorenzo Mazzetti di Pietralata, Emanuele Lonardi and Enrico D'Urso deprived of the status of being a priest and made lay men, by Archbishop Peregro in Ferrara, who rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican
The political party Lega Salvini needs to take up the issue in the Italian Senate of the Italian priests Fathers Riccardo Petroni, Matteo Riboli, Lorenzo Mazzetti di Pietralata, Emanuele Lonardi and Enrico D'Urso deprived of the status of being a priest and made lay men, by Archbishop Peregro in Ferrara, who rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican.
It is unethical and dishonest for the Archbishop and his Curia in Ferrara-Commachio, not to affirm the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the past exclusivist ecclesiology based upon the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and an ecumenism of return into the Catholic Church for the Lutherans and other Christians.This is not possible for Archbishop Peregro since he re-interprets Vatican Council II irrationally as did Pope Paul VI.
The Archbishop must be asked by Lega Mayor Alan Fabri to re-interpret the Creeds and Catechisms rationally, affirm the dogma EENS like the traditionalists and re instate the expelled priests.
An archbishop who cannot affirm the dogma EENS in public should not be an archbishop and he should not be allowed to expel priests who do affirm EENS rationally and traditionally.
In the Senate the Vatican must be asked to reaffirm the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion just like the Italian saints Padre Pio, Gemma Galgani, Catherine of Siena and the popes over the centuries.
Similarly the Senate must be asked why does the Italian Government annually finance the Bologna School of Professor Melloni 1 when he interprets Vatican Council II with the same irrational premise, inference and conclusion as does Archbishop Perego.A false rupture is created with the dogma EENS and the rest of Tradition, in the same unethical way by Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, Archbishop of Bologna, who oversees Ferrara and Emilia Romano, where the Familia Christi serve.-Lionel Andrades
1
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/it/
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/changes-to-budget-laws-in-italy-fuel-leftist-bent-in-catholic-thought
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/it/
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/changes-to-budget-laws-in-italy-fuel-leftist-bent-in-catholic-thought
________________
JANUARY 3, 2020
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue
FEBRUARY 22, 2020
The Italian government is funding Alberto Melloni's John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the headquarters of the so-called "Bologna School,"1 guaranteed another yearly million-euro funding for 2020–2022.Melloni uses the irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II. It is only with a false premise, inference and conclusion that he makes the Council a rupture with Tradition. He could choose the rational premise, inference and conclusion.
_________________________________________
___________________________________________
With this rational model, the Vatican, the Bologna School, Archbishop Pegro and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi , would not be contradicting the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
ATHANASIUS CREED
'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'
___________________________________
___________________________________
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020
Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII and the following popes, interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with a false premise.Pope Paul VI and the following popes interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.
Now Pope Francis interprets the Creeds and Vatican Council Ii with the false premise and so creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition on ecumenism, traditional ecclesiocentic mission, liturgy with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and traditional ecclesiology.It's a different Catholic Church now.The whole Church is following him in the error, conservatives and liberals.
Bishop Schneider, Maike Hickson and John Henry Weston continue to interpret LG 8 and UR 3 in Vatican Council II as exceptions to EENS. Bishop Bernard Fellay did this continously. He never corrected himself. He probably will go to the end of his life, with this error, like Fr.Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari.
If the popes interpret the Creeds without the false premise, like me, they would be opposed by the Jewish Left.There would be persecution.Now there is support.
The two popes do not affirm the Creeds to avoid a persecution of the Church. They have changed the faith-teachings of the Church.
So the official Profession of Faith and Oath of Office for Cardinals, Bishops, Rectors, Superiors and Parish Priests are mere words supporting heresy and dissent.
-Lionel Andrades
______________________________
La Scuola di Bologna sul Concilio Vaticano II dello storico Alberto Melloni è finanziata ogni anno dal governo di sinistra italiano quando interpreta il Concilio con una irrazionale premessa, inferenza e conclusione per respingere il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus se è stato interpretato nel papi Italiani nel corso dei secoli.
-Lionel Andrades
__________________________________
______________________________
MARCH 5, 2020
All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII( Bologna School )of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.
All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Bologna School of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.
Gabriele Albonetti of the Leftist Partito Democratico is member of the Board of Trustees of Melloni's Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII, also called the Bologna School.
Melloni does not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise, for then the Council would support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Melloni's talks on Lutheranism would then be false.His talk on Italian society today being based on Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally , is also false.His talks on the Council supporting the liberalism of Pope Francis is also false.The interpretation of Vatican Council II with the irrationality, is now obsolete.
-Lionel Andrades
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/it/
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/
MARCH 5, 2020
All the books and articles on Vatican Council II in Italy were written with a false premise, inference and conclusion.Lionel's Blog is an exception.Salvini's Lega political party could take up this issue in the Italian Senate
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/all-books-and-articles-on-vatican.html
ARCH 4, 2020
The political party Lega Salvini needs to take up the issue in the Italian Senate of the Italian priests Fathers Riccardo Petroni, Matteo Riboli, Lorenzo Mazzetti di Pietralata, Emanuele Lonardi and Enrico D'Urso deprived of the status of being a priest and made lay men, by Archbishop Peregro in Ferrara, who rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-political-party-lega-salvini-needs.html
_________________________
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2020
La Scuola di Bologna sul Concilio Vaticano II dello storico Alberto Melloni è finanziata ogni anno dal governo di sinistra italiano quando interpreta il Concilio con una irrazionale premessa, inferenza e conclusione per respingere il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus se è stato interpretato nel papi Italiani nel corso dei secoli.
-Lionel Andrades
__________________________________
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
Pope Francis needs to tell Eugenio Scalfari that articles and reports in his newspaper on Vatican Council II have a built-in error : Andrea Tornielli needs to clean up the Vatican websites which carry the same mistake
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
Operation Dustbin
___________________________________________________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment