Can the present two popes who do not use the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II still be popes? De facto yes.But they would be schismatic, heretical, non Magisterial and non traditional.Since they would use the false premise.

 Can the present two popes who do not use the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II still be popes? De facto yes.But they would be schismatic, heretical, non Magisterial and non traditional.Since they would use the false premise to interpret Magisterial documents. This can be avoided with a rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion. -Lionel Andrades

MAY 26, 2021

Questions and Answers about the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/questions-and-answers-about-lionel.html

 MAY 24, 2021

Now we know that we can affirm Vatican Council II without the political version of the liberals, Lefebvrists and Thucs. We stay clear of Pope Francis and Cardinal Burke, the SSPX and St. Benedict Center. Who is left(no pun intended)?Lionel's blog of course.The interpretation of Lionel Andrades. This is reality today

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/now-we-know-that-we-can-affirm-vatican.html

MAY 21, 2021

Pope Paul VI was not Magisterial on Vatican Council II since he used the false premise instead of the rational option.Pope Francis can correct the error

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/pope-paul-vi-was-not-magisterial-on.html

MAY 20, 2021

 

When Pope Francis says that every one needs to accept Vatican Council II, it can not be with his interpretation which is non Magisterial with a fake premise.The only rational interpretation of the Council is the LA interpretation  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/when-pope-francis-says-that-every-one.html

Fake premise

Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.

Rational Premise

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/there-is-no-denial-from-congregation.html   

Lionel Andrades

Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Catholic lay man in Rome,

Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

____________________