So they all continue to reject EENS with alleged exceptions.This is a new doctrine in the Church which is also approved by the Society of St. Pius X and the sedevacantists

 Since 1949 the Catholic Church has been interpreting extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with a false premise. The mistake was made with the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO).They(BOD and I.I) were confused as being physically visible cases. Then they were projected as exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of EENs.

Yesterday Fr. John Zuhlsdorf wrote about BOD without mentioning Feeneyite EENS.He rejects Feeneyite EENS since the BOD is an exception to EENS for him. Also since it is politically correct with the Left.

BOD becomes an exception to EENS for him since it refers to a physically visible person, a non Catholic, saved outside the Church without faith and the baptism of water.

If it was an invisible case it would not be an exception.

This is the false reasoning of the International Theological Commission, Vatican and the popes, cardinals and bishops.

So they all continue to reject EENS with alleged exceptions.This is a new doctrine in the Church which is also approved by the Society of St. Pius X and the sedevacantists. -Lionel Andrades

MAY 25, 2021

Prudent Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/ask-father-can-i-baptize-myself-posted.html