The ball is in the court of the Feeneyites ( those who intepret Vatican Council II and EENS without a false premise).Times have changed.The Lefebvrist-Cushingite theological model,which has to use the false premise, has a recognised flaw.Obsolete.
The liberal and Lefebvrist Cushingites prevented a Restoration/Renewal in the Catholic Church.
We have to get back to the old Feeneyite philosophy and theology of the popes and saints over the centuries.
It is your move now. We can choose the rational, old theology since :-
Invisible cases are just invisible.
Unknown people are not known exceptions to EENS.
No one saw St.Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.
How can a pope who says LG 8, LG 14, LG 1, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II refers to physically visible cases in 1965-2021, be Magisterial ?
How can a pope or cardinal use a false premise and be Magisterial ?
How can the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 be Magisterial when it assumed being saved with invisible baptism of desire and invincible ignorance, were visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS ?
Where are the baptism of desire cases in 2021, who has seen them ?
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not Magisterial on Vatican Council II since they use the false premise instead of avoiding it.
The Catechectical Centers all over the world are not Magisterial on Vatican Council II since they do not interpret the Council without the irrationality. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.
The Catholic Bishops Conferences all over the world are not Magisterial on Vatican Council II- and also the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance, the Catechisms and Creeds and EENS, since the use the fakes premise to create a fake rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
There would be nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of EENS, if the false premise was avoided by the present two popes. They would emerge conservative and traditionalist.
They would be Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Fake premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Fake conclusion
So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Rational Premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021
They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Rational Conclusion
They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
__________
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Fake premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Rational Premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14 and Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
_____________________
Lionel Andrades,
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.One is rational and the other irrational, one has the false premise and the other is without it,
blog: Eucharist and Mission
_______________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment