The professors at the Biblicum do not have the Catholic faith.
I personally asked Prof. Joseph Sievers if Jews needed to convert into the Catholic Church. He would not answer.I mentioned that at the Pontifical Gregorian University, where he would teach formerly, Messianic Jews cannot get admission. He could not comment.
Fr.Diego Sarrio Cucarella teaches Arabic at the Biblicum.He is President of the Pontificial Insitute for Arabic and Islamic Studies(PISAI), Rome.
The Profession of Faith made by Fr. Diego Sarrio Cucarella is false.Since he abjures traditional and magisterial teachings and documents, with the use of a false premise, inference and conclusion.There is no denial from him. He is following the political interpretation of Vatican Council II, like the present two popes.
PISAI organises visits to mosques without telling non Christians that they need to convert into the Catholic Church, with faith and baptism( Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II) to avoid the fires of Hell ( for salvation). Neither do they tell visiting scholars that professors at PISAI interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise, to create a calculated rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the past exclusivist ecclesiology, in general.This is unethical. This is the academic policy among the Jesuits at the Biblicum and the Gregorian University, Rome.-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 26, 2020
No denial from PISAI : they use the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds the dogma extra eccleeiam nulla salus and other magisterial teachings
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/no-denial-from-pisai-they-use.html
FEBRUARY 25, 2020
All the bishops present at Bari use the irrational premise, false inference and false conclusion to create an artificial rupture with the traditional Professio Fidei.So they now affirm a false and new Profession of Faith.It supports the irrational premise, inference and conclusion. It makes Magisterial documents non magisterial.So they support heresy and schism to be in full communion with the Church. The new concept of Church is supported by the New Theology, the Rahner-Ratzinger Theology based upon the irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/all-bishops-present-at-bari-use_25.html
FEBRUARY 24, 2020
Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia , Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Mons Marco Gnarvi, Diocesan Secretary for the Office of Inter religious Dialogue and Ecumenism, Rome Vicariate are in schism with the popes over the centuries . They use an irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create this schism.With this irrationality they have also changed the understanding of the Creeds and Catechism and this is heresy.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/archbishops-giacomo-morandi-and.html
FEBRUARY 27, 2020
Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma by Ludwig Ott (1953) (Baronius) and The Catholic Church and Salvation(1958) by Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton : authors were not aware of the irrational premise, inference and conclusion
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/fundamentals-of-catholic-dogma-by.html
WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2020
Adnane Mokrani was taught an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II at PISAI and the Angelicum
Adnane Mokrani, the first Islamic theologian to teach in a pontifical university - the Gregorian, chair of Islamic Studies obtained his doctorate at the Pontificial Institute of Arabic and Islamic studies (PISAI).But there was an error in his education. Vatican Council II was interpreted with a false premise. This was done to create an artificial rupture with the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.
Mokrani also studied at the Angelicum, with a scholarship.There again he was taught an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
At PISAI they continue to present a false nterpretation of Islamism by using an irrational premise and inference to interpret the Council.Then they present this new version on the Islamic religion, as being Catholic teaching. So for Mokrani these new doctrines are Catholic teachings.
Mokrani interprets Catholic traditional teachings with the false version of Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds and so rejects exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.He has written a book recently on the Death and Resurection of Jesus from an Islamic perspective.He was interviewed recently by the daily Avvenire.1
It may be mentioned that The Profession of Faith made at PISAI by Rev. Fr. Diego Sarrio Cucarella (President),Rev. Fr. Jason Welle OFM(Director of Studies ) and Rev. Fr. Francesco Baronchelli (Secretary) is false.Since they abjure traditional and magisterial teachings and documents, with the use of a false premise, inference and conclusion.It is similar to the archbishops and cardinal at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who follow the error. 2
PISAI does not affirm the Catholic Faith.They are afraid. Simple statements cannot be made.
They do not teach the Catholic Faith and have compromised with the Left for survival.
At the Catholic university in Belgium it is reported there are courses for Imams based on the false interpretation of Vatican Council II.
At the Catholic university in Belgium it is reported there are courses for Imams based on the false interpretation of Vatican Council II.
At the Catholic and secular, universities in Italy, Muslim professors have to interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise, inference and conclusion.
Schisms and heresy are mortal sins of faith for Catholics.Yet the teaching staff at PISAI interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents, as a rupture with the popes and Church Councils over the centuries.They choose this rupture.
If they did not use the irrational premise, inference and conclusion they would have to say that Adnane Mokrani Professor at the Gregorian University on Islamic Studies and Youssef Sbai at the University of Padua, are outside the Catholic Church.
Similarly for Dr.Mobeen Shahid, a Catholic Director of an Islamic academic center for Dialogue in Rome,who now teaches Philosophy at the Urbaniana Pontifical University Rome does not speak and write about the truth of the faith.He interprets magisterial documents with the false premise, inference and conclusion to create the expected rupture with the traditional Catholic concept of other religions.At the Urbaniana University they interpret Vatican Council II with the politically correct error.
According to Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7) all need faith and baptism for salvation. This would include Mokrani and other Muslims.There are no exceptions to AG 7 mentioned in Vatican Council II. Since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only.We cannot meet or see any one saved outside the Church.
So Vatican Council II affirms the Athanasius Creed which states all need Catholic faith for salvation.
The Council is also in harmony with the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 24 Q, 27 Q) on the need for non Catholics to convert into the Church to avoid Hell.
The Council is also in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on ecumenism. Since Unitatis Redintigratio 3 ( Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II refers to a hypothetical case. In real life we cannot know of a Christian saved in his religion outside the Catholic Church. So there is no rupture in Vatican Council II with the old ecumenism of return.
According to Vatican Council II most people are oriented to Hell since they die without faith and baptism, necessary for salvation(AG 7).
This was not taught to Adnane Mokrani at PISAI or the Angelicum.-Lionel Andrades
1
2
FEBRUARY 27, 2020
The Profession of Faith made by Rev. Fr. Diego Sarrio Cucarella (President),Rev. Fr. Jason Welle OFM(Director of Studies ) and Rev. Fr. Francesco Baronchelli (Secretary) of PISAI is false.Since they abjure traditional and magisterial teachings and documents, with the use of a false premise, inference and conclusion.It is similar to the archbishops and cardinal at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who follow the error.
__________________________
FEBRUARY 27, 2020
The Profession of Faith made by Rev. Fr. Diego Sarrio Cucarella (President),Rev. Fr. Jason Welle OFM(Director of Studies ) and Rev. Fr. Francesco Baronchelli (Secretary) of PISAI is false.Since they abjure traditional and magisterial teachings and documents, with the use of a false premise, inference and conclusion.It is similar to the archbishops and cardinal at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who follow the error.
The Profession of Faith made by Rev. Fr. Diego Sarrio Cucarella (President),Rev. Fr. Jason Welle OFM(Director of Studies ) and Rev. Fr. Francesco Baronchelli (Secretary) of PISAI is false.Since they abjure traditional and magisterial teachings and documents, with the use of a false premise, inference and conclusion.It is similar to the archbishops and cardinal at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who follow the error. 1
Like the cardinals and popes, the Pontifical Institute for Arabis and Islamic Studies(PISAI), the Teaching Staff do not affirm the Catholic Faith.They are afraid. Simple statements cannot be made.
They do not teach the Catholic Faith and have compromised with the Left for survival.
At the Catholic university in Belgium it is reported there are courses for Imams based on the false interpretation of Vatican Council II.
At the Catholic and secular, universities in Italy, Muslim professors have to interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise, inference and conclusion.
Schisms and heresy are mortal sins of faith for Catholics.Yet the teaching staff at PISAI interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents, as a rupture with the popes and Church Councils over the centuries.They choose this rupture.
If they did not use the irrational premise, inference and conclusion they would have to say that Adnane Mokrani Professor at the Gregorian University on Islamic Studies and Youssef Sbai at the University of Padua, are outside the Catholic Church.
There is no salvation and all need to be members of the Catholic Church with Catholic faith (Athanasius Creed) for salvation( to avoid Hell). All non Catholics are oriented to Hell without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).Similarly for Dr.Mobeen Shahid, a Catholic Director of an Islamic academic center for Dialogue in Rome teaches Philosophy at the Urbaniana Pontifical University Rome.He does not speak and write about the truth of the faith.He interprets magisterial documents with the false premise, inference and conclusion to create a rupture with the traditional Catholic concept of other religions.-Lionel Andrades
1
FEBRUARY 25, 2020
The Professio Fidei of the CDF supports the irrational premise, inference and conclusion
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/repost-cardinal-ratzingers-professio.html
https://en.pisai.it/
https://twitter.com/IstitutoPisai?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3AIstitutoPisai&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.pisai.it%2F
https://en.pisai.it/
https://twitter.com/IstitutoPisai?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3AIstitutoPisai&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.pisai.it%2F
_________________________________________
https://www.biblico.it/courses_of_anno_corr.html
__________________________________________
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Fake premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Fake conclusion
So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Rational Premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021
They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Rational Conclusion
They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
__________
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Fake premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Rational Premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14 and Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
_____________________
Lionel Andrades,
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.One is rational and the other irrational, one has the false premise and the other is without it,
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
blog: Eucharist and Mission
_______________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment