All the prayer groups in Dijon and the rest of France interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion and so create a false rupture with Catholic Sacred Tradition. This is not known to them.It is the same in my parish Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea, Rome in the diocese of Porta Santa Rufina.
The
Padre Pio Prayer groups, New Cathechumenal Way, Focolares, Legion of Mary,
Charismatic Renewal Movement prayer and worship meetings, St.Vincent de Paul
parish meetings, Medugorje Eucharistic Adoration meetings, Youth Summer camps,
Scout programs etc, all have to use the
false premise to interpret Vatican Council II instead of the rational premise,
inference and conclusion.
FAKE PREMISE IN DIJON, FRANCE
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in
Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
FAKE INFERENCE IN DIJON, FRANCE
FAKE CONCLUSION IN DIJON,FRANCE
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
RATIONAL PREMISE OF LIONEL
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically
invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They
exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time,
space and matter.
RATIONAL INFERENCE OF LIONEL
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church
for us human beings.
RATIONAL CONCLUSION OF LIONEL
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was
interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict
interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is
invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake it used the false premise, inference
and conclusion.
TWO COLUMN APPROACH
Would you interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side
or left hand side column?
LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN - RIGHT HAND SIDE COLUMN
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in
invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds
of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
implicit or explicit
for us.
hypothetical or known in
reality.
invisible or visible
in the flesh.
dejure(in principle)
or
defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective.
So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side
column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II
contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and
Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
There are known exceptions in 2021 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the
Cathlic Church. The dead-saved are visible.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II
does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other
religions and Christian communities and churches.
Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.Bishop Roland Minnerath and the Diocesan priests in Dijon, France use the irrational right hand side column.So there is an artificial break with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance
never ever were an exception to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard
Feeney, unless one is using the right hand side column.There are no
known exceptions.-Lionel Andrades
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-jesuits-in-rome-are-using-fake.html
JULY 4, 2021
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment