If the FSSP does not use the New Theology as part of the New Evangelisation, there will be tension.They would be going back to EENS with no exceptions.They could be suppressed like the Movimento Apostolico and Maria Madre delle Redenzione, of Catanzaro, Italy.

 

Movemento Apostolico -Incontro del Lunedi  12 ottobre 2020

The issue of Evangelisation has not been settled between Bishop Roland Minnerath and the FSSP priests in Dijon, France.The FSSP, like the SSPX, are  going back to Tradition and side stepping Vatican Council II, interpreted with a fake premise. So the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX  and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q,27Q) could be as valid for the FSSP  as Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.This all could be meaningless for the bishop and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican.

Bishop Roland Minnerath and the diocesan priests  accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the fake premise, inference and conclusion.So the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX which supports the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, is made obsolete for him.

The bishop has written books on this subject.He now supports a theology of religions, in his proclamation of Jesus. It is Jesus without the necessity of formal membership in the Catholic Church. His concept of Hell and mortal sin would also be vague and confusing. Catholics in the the diocese will have lost their identity.

Bishop Minnerath creates division in the Church with his New Theology, which comes from the false premise used in the 1949  Letter of the Holy Office(LOHO), relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston.For him extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) has exceptions.

If the FSSP does not use the New Theology as part of the New Evangelisation, there will be tension.They would be going back to EENS with no exceptions.They could be suppressed like the Movimento Apostolico and Maria Madre delle Redenzione, of Catanzaro, Italy.

Bishop Minnerath could not tell the non Christians in Dijon, that they must accept Jesus in the Catholic Church and convert to avoid the fires of Hell. This is not possible.Since the bishop interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and so creates exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc. The FSSP can evangelize non Christians, unlike the bishop, if the FSSP would continue to reject Vatican Council II interpreted with the fake premise.They would also have to reject the Syllabus of Errors , interpreted with the same fake premise. So there would no more be  exceptions  for them for the Catechism of Pope Pius X at 24Q and 24Q in Vatican Council II. They would be in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Church in a way it is not possible for Bishop Minnerath.-Lionel Andrades

 

 JULY 8, 2021

The CDF supports the heretical LOHO and has suppressed a lay community citing 'doctrinal superficialities'

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-cdf-supports-heretical-loho-and-has.html

JULY 8, 2021

Bishop Roland Minneath and the diocesan priests interpreted Vatican Council II with 'the false premise instead of the rational premise', chose 'the right hand side column instead of the left hand side column' and also chose 'the red passages being exceptions to the blue instead of the red passages not being exceptions to the blue'.The FSSP priests make the same mistake

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/bishop-roland-minneath-and-diocesan.html