Would it be a misuse of office for a judge of the Vatican Court to confuse LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to real people in 1965-2021, saved without faith and baptism, outside the Catholic Church, who are practical exceptions to the exclusivist interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the rest of Catholic Tradition, as held by numerous Catholics today ?

Would it be a misuse of office for a judge of the Vatican Court to confuse LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to real people in 1965-2021, saved without faith and baptism, outside the Catholic Church, who are practical exceptions to the exclusivist interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the rest of Catholic Tradition, as held by numerous Catholics today ?

Where are the examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church for a judge, to reject Catholic Tradition ?When a person is saved he or she is in Heaven and is known only to God and the people who are there in Heaven.We can accept in faith a St. Emerentiana, as being in Heaven, but who could have seen her there without the baptism of water? The present two popes and the cardinals and bishops reject Catholic Tradition with their reasoning which really is innovative and a lie.-Lionel Andrades