Bishop
Athanasius Schneider in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall has said that
there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in the present times(2021).
So LG 14 ( Case of the Catechumen) would be a hypothetical and speculative case
only. But for Cardinal Marx this is not his interpretation of Vatican Council
II upon which is based the German Synodal Way.For him LG 14 and also LG 16, UR
3, NA2, GS 22, LG 16,LG 8 would refer to literal cases of non Catholics in the
present times (1965-2021) saved without ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7), outside the
Church. It is only in this way that he can avoid affirming Catholic Tradition
(EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
If the Germans
interpreted LG 14 like Bishop Athanasius Schneider there would be no
theological bases for the German Synodal Breakaway.
In France,
Bishop Roland Mitterand in Dijon, wrote his books on the Concordats and the
theology of religious pluralism by interpreting LG 14 irrationally.The French
Bishops’ Conference must be asked to clarify that the baptism of desire is
always hypothetical, theoretical and invisible for us human beings.In
principle, hypothetical cases of LG 14, LG 16 etc cannot be practical
exceptions in 2021 to Tradition ( Catechism of Pope Pius X, Council of Trent
etc).
Like the French,
Cardinal Peter Erdo in Hungary and the Hungarian Bishops’ Conference, could
also be confusing the “implicit baptism of desire” of St. Thomas Aquinas as
being explicit in the present times.
In Poland, the
National Catechetical Center is in schism with the past Magisterium, since with
visible cases of the baptism of desire, a hermeneutic of rupture is
created with the Athanasius Creed, the
Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q,27Q).They need to issue a statement on this
issue.
Their Episcopal
Conference, like those all over the world, interpret the baptism of desire with
a fake and not rational premise . So there is a fake break with Catholic
Tradition.
The
Schneider-Marshall video is really asking the U.S bishops to be ethical and
honest.They are saying that the cardinals and bishops in Britain are also
dishonest, when they project the baptism of desire as an exception to EENS
according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
The bishops in Switzerland
had also been asking the Society of St. Pius X to interpret the baptism of
desire with the irrationality mentioned by Bishop Schneider, and then to accept
the non traditional conclusion.This is not Catholic.
Pope Benedict
did not grant canonical recognition to the SSPX
and said it was a doctrinal issue.Bishop Charles Morerod in Switzerland would
not allow the SSPX to use the churches there, and said it was a doctrinal
issue. They had to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false
premise and accept the non traditional conclusion, like the liberals.
Pope Benedict
needs to be honest.He needs to apologize to the SSPX.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 28, 2021
So we proclaim the Faith and return to traditional mission as at the time of St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier
So we proclaim the Faith and return to traditional mission as at the time of St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier. All non Catholics are oriented to Hell according to Bishop Athanasius Schneider and not only those ‘who know’ about Jesus and the Church(LG 14) – since invincible ignorance is no more a practical exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).All in general need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7) and if there are any exceptions of those 'who know' or 'do not know' it could only be known to God.So there are no known practical exceptions for the Great Commission.
The Council Fathers (1965) made an objective error when they projected the baptism of desire(LG 14) as an exception to EENS according to Loyola, Bellarmine and Xavier.This mistake was there in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston(LOHO).Pope Benedict needs to issue a correction and apologise. Since his New Theology is based upon the false premise of the LOHO.
The false premise of Pope Benedict is now a theological virus that has spread in the Catholic Church, like an epidemic. He has to end it.He must correct Pope Francis’ mistake, which is also that of the College of Cardinals.
Pope Benedict needs to tell Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II have got the ‘virus’ and so are useless.They were made irrelevant with the error. Also Pope Benedict’s books on Ecclesiology published by Ignatius Press, and in the many German editions, have to be phased out. The pontifical universities must note the error in the books on Ecclesiology, written also by Semeraro, Kasper and Forte.
Pope Benedict wanted the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to keep interpreting the baptism of desire(LG 14) as referring to to literal cases, presently known to us. So they would have to interpret Vatican Council II (LG 14 etc) in principle, by confusing invisible cases as being physically visible. Then with this irrationality they would have to accept the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition, which would follow with the use of the false premise. It was only with this doctrinal and theological error, was he prepared to grant the SSPX canonical recognition.Pope Francis needs to apologise.
Pope Benedict wanted the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 14 being a literal example of salvation outside the Church in the present times and Bishop Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall are saying there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in 1965-2021.
Bishop Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall are avoiding the fake premise ( invisible people are visible in the present times) and Pope Benedict and Pope Francis have to use it to create a break with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
If the popes choose the rational premise ( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2021 are invisible) then they would be saying that in Vatican Council II, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc do not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, opposed by the Left.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 28, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no known literal cases of the baptism of desire in our human reality but Cardinal Ratzinger wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus with there being literally known cases of being saved with the baptism of desire
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has-said_28.html
AUGUST 27, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall
are telling Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II are written
with a false premise and in general they are obsolete
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-and-dr.html
AUGUST 26, 2021
Bishop Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall directly
oppose Pope Francis on the New Theology : Vatican Council II is not a break
with Tradition when the premise is rational
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-schneider-and-dr-taylor-marshall.html
AUGUST 25, 2021
Bishop Schneider is one step away from
saying that Vatican Council II does not contradict Tradition and the SSPX are
no more in schism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-schneider-is-one-step-away-from.html
AUGUST 25, 2021
Bishop
Athanasius Schneider has said that we do not know of any literal case of
someone saved with the baptism of desire in the present times
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has-said.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment