Fr.John
Zuhsldorf has posted Peter Kwasniewski’s talk at Denver on his blog and this is appreciated by the
liberals and Masons.Kwasniewski and Zuhsldorf interpret Vatican Council II as a
break with Tradition, a break with ‘the true Church’.
They are
not saying that without the false premise, LG 8, LG 16 etc do not contradict
the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Kwasniewski
does not interpret Vatican Council II as a continuation with Catholic Tradition,
for example, the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for
salvation.He supports the political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II,
as does the Bologna School of Alberto Melloni and Fr. Z.
Similarly the Lodges are pleased with Don Pietro Leone ‘s reports on the webblog Rorate Caeili. Leone is unable to see LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, etc in Vatican Council II as referring to invisible cases in 2021.He projects Unitatis Redintigratio 3 as an exception to the past ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church. So he implies that UR 3 is physically visible case in 1965-2021. An invisible person could not be an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment