The SSPX has to show Pope Francis that his interpretation of Vatican Council II is schismatic and so would be unacceptable and that they choose a rational and non traditional version

 

The SSPX has to show Pope Francis that his interpretation of Vatican Council II is schismatic and so would be unacceptable and that they choose a rational and non traditional version.

So the SSPX would be in schism, as the media states, if they did not accept Vatican Council II. But there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. One is rational and the other irrational. One is with the false premise and the other without it.Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith refer to the irrational version.

So the SSPX simply has to affirm the rational version and tell Pope Francis and the CDF to do the same.Otherwise they would be in schism.

With their false premise, there would be the expected break with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX with no known exceptions.Now there is a break with the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q,27Q-other religions, need for conversion) and the Council of Trent ( exclusive salvation).

The SSPX must realize that the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise cannot be Magisterial.Since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake and confuse invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, etc are being examples of salvation in 2021 and so them project them as practical exceptions to EENS etc.

So under no condition must the SSPX accept Pope Francis’ irrational and schismatic version of Vatican Council II when the rational and non schismatic is available.Check the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II on the Internet ( Blog eucharistandmission ).

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a false rupture with Tradition and he calls it the work of the Holy Spirit, in the Letter which accompanies Traditionis Custode.

A recent stage of this dynamic was constituted by Vatican Council II where the Catholic episcopate came together to listen and to discern the path for the Church indicated by the Holy Spirit. To doubt the Council is to doubt the intentions of those very Fathers who exercised their collegial power in a solemn manner cum Petro et sub Petro in an ecumenical council, and, in the final analysis, to doubt the Holy Spirit himself who guides the Church.- Letter of Pope Francis which accompanies Traditionis Custode(Emphasis added)

 https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/letters/2021/documents/20210716-lettera-vescovi-liturgia.html

How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake and use a false premise to interpret LG 14( baptism of desire) and LG 16( invincible ignorance),for example ?

For me LG 14 and LG 16 refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases always. They are always speculative and not real people saved outside the Church in the present times, 1965-2021. This is something obvious.

How can LG 14, LG 16 etc be exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed and Syllabus of Errors ? Yet this is how he is interpreting Vatican Council II and it is different from the rational way I interpret the Council.I interpret the Council with the rational premise ( invisible people are invisible) and consider it Magisterial.Since it is not a rupture with the past Magisterium. Pope Francis cannot say the same.

The SSPX could simply affirm Vatican Council II without the fake premise and also come back to Tradition, since Tradition would not be contradicted with Vatican Council II, with the rational premise.So they should tell Pope Francis that his interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational and schismatic.He has to switch to the rational one for them to accept the Council.-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 5, 2021

Singing for the Masons

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/singing-for-masons.html

AUGUST 5, 2021

France needs to accept the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II then at every Holy Mass in the French language, the only rational choice will be the Tridentine exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/france-needs-to-accept-lionel-andrades.html

AUGUST 5, 2021

John Henry Weston in a follow up program to the one on outside the Church there is no salvation , has to clarify, since Catholics are confused, that, there is an extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) being exceptions and there is an EENS with BOD and I.I not being exceptions. The EENS with BOD and I.I being exceptions is the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) version and the EENS with BOD and I.I not being exceptions is the St. Benedict Centers(SBC) version.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/john-henry-weston-in-follow-up-program.html