I don’t interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the False Premise. I use the Rational Premise.I also do not ask for donations. I don’t earn any money from this blog. I have no fixed income and neither a bank account.

 

I don’t interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the False Premise. I use the Rational Premise.I also do not ask for donations. I don’t earn any money from this blog. I have no fixed income and neither a bank account. When I have to give up this blog there will be no attachments.My life is simple in Rome. For some 19 years I have been living only in Rome.Before I came to Rome I gave away all my ‘immondizia’ (money).I don't use a cell phone and have been living a eremitical life in the city of martyrs and saints. -Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome,

Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail