If Judge Joseph DiClerico Jr., in New Hampshire is Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS then he will note that Fr. Georges de Laire is unethical and dishonest, even after being informed and so is Bishop Peter Libasci, the Bishop of the Diocese of Manchester.

 

There are two interpretations of Magisterial Documents , one with the False Premise which I call Cushingite and the other with the Rational Premise I call Feeneyite.Cushingism is a break with the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions).Feneeyism is in harmony with Tradition.

So it is not enough to refer, for example, to Vatican Council II, without specifying if you mean Vatican Council II Cushingite or Feeneyite.

Here is a short list.

Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).

Athanasius Creed ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite or Cushingite ).

Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).

Catechism of the Council of Trent ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).

Catechism of the Baltimore ( Feeneyite or Cushingite )

Catechism of Pope Pius X ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite or Cushingite ).

These are Primary Church Documents. We can interpret them with the False Premise or the Rational Premise and the conclusion would be irrational or rational.

There are also Secondary Church Documents. They are only Cushingite.There are no Church Documents after Vatican Council II, which I can think of , which are only Feeneyite.

Traditionis Custode is Cushingite.Pope Francis used the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.

The Lutheran-Catholic Declaration on Justification is Cushingite.

The Balamand Declaration is Cushingite and so null and void.

In a Primary Document we can choose between Feeneyism and Cushingism. In a Secondary Document we cannot choose.It is Cushingite.

Vatican Council II itself is a Primary Document since there are Feeneyite and Cushingite passages.

In Dijon, France the writings of Bishop Roland Mitterand are Cushingite and so he was made a consultant to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF).

The Dominicans today, unlike St.Dominic, are Cushingites and so they were appointed members of the Vatican’s International Theological Commission.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall have been Cushingite but when they said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire and there are no explicit cases of Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire, they were Feeneyite.They implied that there were no objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. There were none mentioned in Vatican Council II.

Fr. Georges de Laire, Vicar General, in the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA, is Cushingite and so he was approved by the CDF to place a harsh Decree of Prohibitions upon the St. Benedict Center(SBC).The SBC are Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS.

If Judge Joseph DiClerico Jr., in New Hampshire is Feeneyite  on Vatican Council II and EENS then he will note that Fr. Georges de Laire is unethical and dishonest, even after being informed and so is Bishop Peter Libasci, the Bishop of the Diocese of Manchester.

They are following the CDF which is also Cushingite on Vatican Council II and EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms.Cushingism is irrational.So they are irrational on Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms.

For a secular  or religious judiciary , a False Premise is a False Premise, a lie is a lie.-Lionel Andrades