Judge Joseph A. Diclerico Jr., in New Hampshire could note that the St.Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire ( mentioned by Fr. Georges de Laire in the legal suit against Michael Voris) is being defamed only because they refuse to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a False Premise.
Fr. Georges de Laire and the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester,USA, use the False Premise to interpret all Magiserterial Documents and there is no denial from any of them. The Curia does not deny using the unethical False Premise.
Even the National Catholic Reporter and New Hampshire Union Leader use the False Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents.Then they calumninate the St. Benedict Center directly or innuendo for not choosing the same deception and the lie.
The diocese of Manchester cannot explain their theological and doctrinal position in writing( as I have done on this blog Eucharist and Mission ).They would say that they are following the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).But the CDF also uses the same False Premise , to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
The CDF has no right to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction .It must not suggest that people saved with the baptism of desire etc are in Heaven and also visible on earth for them to be exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus .
They cannot be in two places at the same time.
This is fantasy and irrational.This nonsense cannot be a reason to impose a harsh Decree of Prohibitions on the religious at the St.Benedict Center.
The Slaves, an ultra-traditionalist offshoot of a Massachusetts group founded by the late Rev. Leonard Feeney, were ordered to stop calling themselves Catholic in January 2019 under the terms of a letter from the diocese. The group was given an extensive list of prohibitions, including a restriction against raising money for a Catholic entity. 1
It is false to call them ultra traditionalist when they affirm Vatican Council II and EENS but interpret them rationally unlike Damien Fisher(New Hamphire Union Leader) and Christopher White and Heidi Schlumpf at the National Catholic Reporter, who affirm Vatican Council II and EENS irrationally to create a break with Feeneyite EENS.
Rev. Georges de Laire, the episcopal vicar for canonical affairs for the Diocese of Manchester, said the fundraising for the school may fall just short of violating the 2019 restrictions. While the group cannot claim it is operating a Catholic school, it instead claims its school offers an education in the “Catholic tradition.”
“They know exactly what they are doing,” de Laire said. “It is not the first time the group has manipulated language in order to project official recognition by the Catholic Church.”
According to a statement on the diocesan website, the group is not supposed to imply in any way an affiliation with the church. 2
Fr.Georges de Laire refuses to say in public what really is his theological position, if he has any on this issue. The CDF is irrational and so non traditional on this issue.
The CDF Archbishops use the same False Premise as Fr. Georges de Laire to avoid affirming Feeneyite EENS.This is unethical and dishonest. For political reasons they change the theology and doctrines of the Catholic Church, with the use of a Fake Premise.Then those who do not support this deception are hit with sanctions.
How can Fr. Georges de Laire remain a Judicial Vicar when he interprets Magisterial documents deceptively and does not deny it?
Bishop Peter Libasci, Fr. Georges de Laire, the National Catholic Reporter and the New Hampshire Union Leader reporters could clarify that they do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise. They are not unethical and dishonest.
1.If they do use the False Premise they are unethical and dishonest.
2.If they do not use the False Premise they hold the same theological and doctrinal position as the St.Benedict Center. They would be rejecting the New Theology and going back to the old theology. They would be affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the traditional exclusivist interpretation.The irrational and deceptive interpretation of the CDF would be avoided.
The liberal media and Fr. Georges de Laire and the CDF must let us know where they stand on these issues.-Lionel Andrades
1
https://www.unionleader.com/news/religion/religious-community-raises-money-despite-restrictions/article_b7b4f383-c0db-5c0f-be40-4a7e2ccafa3c.html
2
ibid
__________________________
NOVEMBER 6, 2021
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment