Now with the Lefebvrists and this Feeneyite community using the False Premise they maintain the liberal-traditionalist division in the Church. They are supporting ‘the development of doctrine’. Without the False Premise there is no development of doctrine.

 

https://www.saintbenedict.com/about-us/

With Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise( irrespective if they accept or reject the non traditional conclusion) Brother Thomas Augustine MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA.,USA contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus held by Fr. Leonard Feeney and the other .The community has been 're-founded by Brother Hugh MacIsaac in 1976 in the spirit of Father Leonard Feeney'.

Theologically they are also in a rupture with the Nicene Creed since in Vatican Council II there are exceptions, to ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins’. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions. They are also exceptions for EENS ( Feeneyite). It would be different if the community was interpreting Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.

Vatican Council II, irrational indicates that they will interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X with 29Q ( invincible ignorance) being an exception for 24Q and 27 Q ( outside the Church there is no salvation).This is the same error made by the Lefebvrists and liberals.

So even though they offer/ attend the Latin Mass they use the New Theology, with the False Premise, which is the same as that at Holy Mass in the vernacular.They are liberals who attend the Latin Mass, the same as the Society of St. Pius X.

The division between traditionalists and liberals does not come with the Latin Mass but the use of the False or Rational Premise.If traditiionalists and liberals avoided the False Premise they return to the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology and are conservatives.They also do not give the liberals/ progressivists and opportunity to quote Vatican Council II and support their liberalism.

Now with the Lefebvrists and this Feeneyite community using the False Premise they maintain the liberal-traditionalist division in the Church. They are supporting ‘the development of doctrine’. Without the False Premise there is no development of doctrine.

There are no ‘reforms of Vatican Council II’ the Council is no more a ‘new revelation’ or ‘new revolution’ in the Catholic Church when the Rational Premise is used to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc..

DECEMBER 4, 2021

Brother Thomas Augustine MICM in the Diocese of Worcester and the community are interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology.So they would be interpreting other Magisterial Documents with the same False Premise, when the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are mentioned

Bishop Thomas Augustine MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA,USA, have received  canonical recognition in the Diocese of Worcester, USA since they accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise by Bishop Robert McManus.The bishop of Worcester does not affirm Vatican Council II ( rational).Vatican Council II ( rational ) is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions as held by Brother Thomas Augustine MICM and the community at Still River, Mass.So with Vatican Council II ( irrational ) they are following the same theology as the liberals and Lefebvrists.That they go for the Latin Mass does not make a difference.

 They are interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology.So they would be interpreting other Magisterial Documents with the same False Premise, when the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are mentioned. -Lionel Andrades

https://immaculateheartschool.org/about/

https://www.saintbenedict.com/sisters-micm/